Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors
Education is considered one of cardinal building blocks of a nation or a society. More the focus is laid on the quality of education, more concrete the future it ensures. University education to be more specific, is most important of them all, as it is the last type of education an individual will take before opting for a career, in majority of cases. Universities, no doubt, put a lot of effort in inproving the quality of education they impart. They do this by practicing different measures and road maps. In the statement mentioned above, it is stated that in order to improve quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries of the universities of the professors. I strongly disagree with this statement. In the following paragraphs, I present my justifications for the stand taken in order to bolster my opinion.
Starting with the reason that if we try to improve the quality of education by spending money on increasing the salaries of the professors, then this may not lead to desirable consequences in every case. Rather if money is spent more on the ongoing research in the university premises, that would turn out to be more fruitful. If we are imparting education to students then more focus should be put on providing and improving resources directly responsible for their education. No doubt, that professors also come under the category of resources of imparting education but increasing salaries of the professors seems rather an indirect way of improving the resources. Investing in resources, that are linked in more direct way to the education of students for example, infrastructure, research equipment, project fundings etc. would be more profitable.
Moving on, to second reason of disagreement. Spending more money on salaries of professors might relax them and they might not put the same effort in their profession as compared to earlier. Rather if salaries are incremented based on the performance of the professor, research work done by the professors and teaching hours devoted by the professor, that would seem to be more fair and logical.
Next, I want to put some light on the alternate opinion, that, it might also dicourage professors if their salaries remain stagnant for years and years despite the effort they are putting in their profession.
At the end, I would like to conclude by asserting that, it seems incoherant to spend more money on salaries of the professors while ignoring other possible sectors of inproving education. On the other hand, while increasing the salaries of the professors, their overall performance must be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | MiladHakimi | 60 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...o desirable consequences in every case. Rather if money is spent more on the ongoing r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...heir profession as compared to earlier. Rather if salaries are incremented based on th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, then, while, for example, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9514245389 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2404498609 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403752696423 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116437300363 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106764997991 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203973417369 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110106102843 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.