Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of student's project engendered copious controversies among people. Some people incline toward the opinion is that it is more beneficial for students to work together on homework. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is vital and crucial to work alone. As far as I am concerned, when teachers advocate projects, it is necessary and essential for juvenile to work in a group. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
A further more subtle point is that students extend their knowledge by work with their classmates. Students can share and exchange their knowledge with each other when students create a group. For instance, the group of students who work on a project expresses their idea and solution precisely and by this way, they can learn more effectively. Moreover, they can help each other while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special area and by working in a group, they can help each other to improve and enhance their knowledge in that area. For instance, a person who has not a great background in math when work with an expert in the mathematical area get motivated and inspired to learn more and reinforce and boost his weakness.
The second significant point supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A team of students are going to share their work among themselves and can submit their project before the deadline pass and after that they have spare time to help other members to resolve their problem. But, when a student works alone on a project, it is an arduous task for him because of lack of time he cannot solve his questions. For example, a student who works alone on a difficult project can end it near the deadline time. If he tries to solve his problems, he cannot present his project at determined time. Hence, he has to skip and forget his problems and only try to finish his project.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned arguments, students by working in groups can exchange and improve their knowledge and solve their problem. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- TPO 8 the Chevalier s memoir accuracy 80
- TPO 12 73
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 65
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ther while they are working in a group. many students have a weakness in a special a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...t supporting my idea is that in a group students have time to solve their problem. A tea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7875 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62216394415 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4220413617 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.789473684 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292924906563 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105571448221 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552556457466 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181509188246 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052126072181 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.