Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people say that young force of a society are the most active part of the society. In this age, the are full of energy and can put it all in the development of the society. However, I strongly agree with the statement in the prompt that says young people rarely have time now-a-days to pay heed to others' problems. In the next following paragraphs it has been addressed why.
First of all, young people today are too busy with their lives that they hardly have any time to look into other peoples' lives. As this is an age of technology, the youth are more inclined to indulge in the activities that they find enjoyable. This advanced technology allows them to be exposed to all sorts of entertainment starting from movies, TV series, gaming to what not. They sort of create their own little world where other people do not have the option to enter. In this scenario, they do not what what is going on around them. For example, in the past, the little children and the adolescents used to take part in community development programs such as tree plantation or cleaning of the common space. But, we cannot see that picture today. If the technology was not this readily available, those youths would come out of their cocoon and joined in helping the community. So, it is evident that, for the frequent use of the advanced stuff, the young generation got more inclined to the inside world.
Secondly, the changing dynamics in the social pattern specially in the formation of families also takes participation as the cause of this problem. In the past, people used to live in joint families where all the children were reared together in harmony and they were taught the basic moral values from the early stages of their lives that later helped them shape out to be better human beings. But as time went by, nuclear families started to rise where both the parents were service holders and focus more on their career growth rather on children. These children are brought up by their nannies or in a day-care center. So they miss out on the familial teachings on the moral qualities such as taking part in community tasks or simply helping a person out. For example, my brother was raised mostly by his babysitter because I have a working mom. My brother lacks the social skills in a very bad way and he rarely goes outside and take part in the community activity. Had the bonding between the families been that strong, perhaps there would have been a different case today. So, absence of teachings from the family can contribute to this problem as well.
To conclude, judging the young peoples' attitude in helping out communities is a complex task because, frankly the time and the social pattern have changed. With newer options available and having lower family connection can have profound impact in this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their empl 80
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 73
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ctive part of the society. In this age, the are full of energy and can put it all in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: what
...to enter. In this scenario, they do not what what is going on around them. For example, i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ll. To conclude, judging the young peoples attitude in helping out communities is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, sort of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72874493927 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3642199496 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536437246964 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0326103735 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144890850695 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404875901282 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048226119004 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100120344322 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360926777448 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.