Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Experienced statesmen usually take important decisions for the whole society, but it does not mean that younger persons have no influence on that decisions. Most part of the society is consists of younger people, so they can affect in the future of the community in many different ways, whether directly or indirectly.
At first, there are some elections for choosing important decision-makers positions in any civilized communities, such as presidential election, Senate elections, and city or state elections. Young people can choose their intended candidates among others, and promote the ideas of that person or party in the society. Due to the high percentage of younger people in most communities, they can affect the results of the elections indirectly. The Young people are the most active parts of any country, they can debate and convince other people to choose their intended candidates, so in that fashion, they will have significant effects on their future and the future of society as a whole. For example, in last elections in my country, there was two completely different parties, the one with more modern ideas, which was closer to the young people opinions, and the one with more classic and conservatives ideas, which was not popular between youngsters. The young people advertise the ideas of the first party, and explained their ideas about the social, political, and economical problems for other people, as a result, the second party loses the election, even with so much money they spend on their advertisement.
In addition, there are so many ways for young people to declare their needs and problems, so the governors can get better choices in favor of the younger people. Some of these ways are, debating in universities and publishing their ideas about their problems and concerns, advertising their opinions in social media such as newspapers, TV, blogs, and other ways, establishing some groups for making decisions and send the results to the governers. For instance, I remember there was some educational problem in the universities, and the governors did not attend to it, but after a while, the students started a campaign about that issue, and notify other members of the society by social media like websites and newspaper, so the government address that problem, and fulfiled the needs of young people.
In the end, it might seem that important decisions are getting by older and more experienced people in the society, but they often make those decisions by the feedback from people of the society, and since the society affected by young people more than other groups, the decisions will meet their demands eventually.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ffect in the future of the community in many different ways, whether directly or indirectly. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1070, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... ideas about the social, political, and economical problems for other people, as a result,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14780600462 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70839552943 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473441108545 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.86738351254 696% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3800301754 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.75 100.406767564 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0833333333 20.6045352989 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165290023446 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708968434478 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506674989402 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11931761587 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439562480239 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 58.1214874552 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.247311828 205% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.