Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Are not juvennils member of our society for making it to a better place to live? However, some people claim that youngers are the most vital part of our population in all fields such as economic, policy, etc. but others do not think so. In my view, each person can have own effect at future of society. I feel this way for 3 main reasons which I will explor them in the following essay.
First, being able to vote at the age of 18 for younger s in many countries means that they are matured in this age and can decide for their future condition of life. For example, I live in Iran and every 4 years we have president selection. This political event need to cooperate of all people who have more that 18 years old. Before leggalization this age for voting, many young people could not take part in this selection . As a result, younger people's commitness is more than past nowadays.
In addition, today, there are various clubs in universities which encorrage students to attend in various activities; such as sports, politics, economics, etc. For instance, last year, when I was senior student in my college, I was an active member of political club and I could guide many students for opposing a special rule against women. We could resist and prosper to cancel that rule.
last, observing many scientific national and international festivals, sports competitions, scientific invents, helps us to understand cooperation of youngers part in our society. To clarify, every year, many students take part in student's scientific olympiad such as chemistry, astronomy, physics, etc. and often they continue their education in those fields as their occupation. Furthermore, the role of young part of society in our developing world is inevitable. Generally, it is necessary to use from this section of our potential and refresh sources for construction a developed world.
- tpo 28Question: Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.Peary's North Pole expedition 83
- Question: Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.In the united state employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees wna 81
- TPO 45In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
- TPO 31 76
- TPO 46Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.medical about patient traditionally or electronic 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... at the age of 18 for younger s in many countries means that they are matured in this age...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lization this age for voting, many young people could not take part in this selec...
^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le could not take part in this selection . As a result, younger peoples commitness...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...ist and prosper to cancel that rule. last, observing many scientific national and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9335443038 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73166084315 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585443037975 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9698620129 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6111111111 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864698474969 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311290722168 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240568440376 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541536257711 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348376386518 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.