Do you agree or disagree with the followng statement?
People learn things better from those at their own level-such a fellow students or co-wokers than those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors
In recent times, many people believe that one can easily learn from one another and makes life more suitable. I agree with the idea that people achieve more better from their colleagues than from those at higher rank than them. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, people will learn more from their peers in a better way because of the level of relationship among them. Indeed, when one is working with his master, it will be difficult to have direct rapport with him. Moreover, some supervisors never give room for play with their staff letalone cracking jokes with them whereby all these attitudes of self-dependent make workers not to be free with their boss. However, if it is a fellow worker, one can ask different question at a time because of the tremendous interaction between them. Also the relationship between co-workers is a friendly one. This friendship will generate an intimacy which make them free to do whatever they like resulting into better learning from one another. My personal experience is an example of this. In the company that I work, I love asking question on any difficult task from my colleagues rather than going to my boss because if I should meet my master, she will either walked me out of her office or scold me in a manner that I will hate myself.
Secondly, learning things with ease is better with people of your own level because of lack of fear. Certainly, students don't like to relate with strict teachers. This is because they believe they cannot learn and understand the concept of that specific subject as a result of fear. Moreover, students will be bored meeting unfriendly teachers because they believe nothing good will come out of it. Nevertheless, students prefer getting to their colleagues that are more brilliant and intelligent. This is because they know that they will not be scared to relate with them which give them a better and deeper understanding they need. For instance, My friend is a compelling example of this. She likes attending group work in the school, she believes that she learns faster and better there than meeting any of the lecturer that can sometimes bullying.
In conclusion, I strongly belief that it is better to achieve from your peer group than from people of higher rank because of the intimacy between them as a colleague and there will be no fear in meeting them.
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000
- Do you agree or disagree with the followng statement People learn things better from those at their own level such a fellow students or co wokers than those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...agree with the idea that people achieve more better from their colleagues than from those a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he tremendous interaction between them. Also the relationship between co-workers is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...te myself. Secondly, learning things with ease is better with people of your own ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...se of lack of fear. Certainly, students dont like to relate with strict teachers. T...
^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ainly, students dont like to relate with strict teachers. This is because they be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82409638554 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50858303087 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493975903614 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7672138294 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231887753908 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763219401296 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835369577133 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155525756686 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474347727432 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.