Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistake
Parents have always been playing an imperative role on children's life. But how on earth is a beneficial way for parenting? As far as I am concerned, only when children are able to make and solve mistakes on their own could they grow up as more capable and responsible individuals.
To begin with, it is the mistakes and the experience we gain from mistakes that turn us into more independent individuals, for which we could develop sharper edges when we step into the society. As we would all understand, in the broad society, chances are small that there will always be someone who lead you to the shortcuts or impart knowledge and experience about which way you should go. In order to be accustomed to the adult world, children are obliged to be trained to try every path by themselves and be exposed to the potential dangers. After they have experienced failures and tears running down their faces, it is the time they start to man up, reflecting about the mistakes and learning from it, because of which they could have the courage to face every challenge they are supposed to encounter. Unless parents allow their children to make mistakes and combat it themselves, children could hardly be capable of resolving and overcoming the difficulties in later life.
On top of this, the more mistakes children make and the more lessons they absorb from them, the more likely that the efficiency would see a rise when they address the similar difficulties later. According to reliable sources of data released by psychologists, linking things with ourselves produces a more profound influence on us. This means that children could be impressed by the mistakes so much that they could hardly erase the memories of that or excise the experiences they learned from it. Therefore, when next time a similar situation appears, they will not panic but endeavor to solve it more efficiently with their prior experiences. As the case for learning cycling, children who fall over but get back to the road by himself without the parent’s help tend to be proficient in riding more quickly. As a result, learning from the mistakes poses positive influence on children‘s coping abilities in the future.
Hereby I have made myself quite clear: never should parents interfere too much with the process of children making and learning from the mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-21 | mitra.m | 53 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | izhangyi | 90 | view |
| 2018-05-17 | KalynIsMe | 76 | view |
| 2017-11-15 | mehrdad.imnnn | 82 | view |
| 2016-09-07 | Ah.ghaffarkhah | 83 | view |
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends a joining a sports team b participating in community activities c traveling 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most importantcharacteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistake 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...r experiences. As the case for learning cycling, children who fall over but get back to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96202531646 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6884049603 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53417721519 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6514070518 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297579683963 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106592629865 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603617007483 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200978631918 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00866860144686 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.