Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
In the recent decades, we are stepping into the Information Age by the proliferation of the mass media. However, it seems to me that with the information explosion, the accuracy of the information are less emphasized than before and the decline in its importance might wreak havoc on the whole society.
To begin with, pursuing exact and accurate information has been a declining trend. This is due to the fact that we are surrounded with a large amount of information from all kinds of media, being saturated with today's news, recent political events, stock market trends and so on. Therefore, we are left with too little time to even look through them all, not to mention to have a minute speculating about whether the media is revealing the accurate information or not. For instance, as university students, we have a hectic schedule, busying with academic work and social activities, with not much time left to care about what is happening out of the campus right now. Even if when we squeeze our time to look through the news and events on the Internet, we could hardly take the accuracy of the information into consideration, instead, trusting these news and then focusing back on the school work is a more efficient way for us to rewind. Therefore, being awash with exploded information, we have no choice but to rely on the media, leaving behind its correctness.
On the other hand, this phenomenon might pose threat on the development of the society as a whole. Too often, the mass media is controlled by some interest parties, so that they may not be revealing the truth. Not concerning about the accuracy, people may be misled by the information presented in the media. In terms of the economic field, some media just give some unreliable information about the trend of the stocks ruthlessly so as to gain tremendous profits. People who take a trust in them might be afraid of the crazy stock market they are facing and invest in a not reasonable way, contributing to the probability that the entity economy might be at stake. In terms of the politics field, during the Presidential Election in the USA, people were quite convinced that Secretary Hilary would win the competition, since all the media were talking about how her debate were more persuasive and how her policies were wiser. However, thousands of people dropped their jaws when it turned out that Trump has become the president and were outrageous. It was at that time that they realized that the media might be misleading about the voting trend, which actually affected their voting choice. As a result, the society might encounter insurmountable setbacks due to the fact that people are not being passionate about the truth of the information on the media.
Hereby I have made myself quite clear: Since people are careless about the accuracy of the media, the whole society might be under threats in all sorts of fields.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most importantcharacteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistake 76
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends a joining a sports team b participating in community activities c traveling 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia is revealing the accurate information or not. For instance, as university stud...
^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...n into consideration, instead, trusting these news and then focusing back on the school wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...bout the trend of the stocks ruthlessly so as to gain tremendous profits. People who tak...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, talking about, as a result, on the whole, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86491935484 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.648710953 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497983870968 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6075128326 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.055555556 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210765035502 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748361325052 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490438399381 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130304482495 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242796411124 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.