Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people are convinced that any development is always for better when others think that evolution has negative effects on the mankind. Personally, I think that technological progress is not always advantageous. There are a few reasons why I hold this stance.
First of all, development of technology has created unemployment. In the second half of the twentieth century, the sudden proliferation of computers in people`s life lead to a modernization of the majority of industries. Owners of large factories preferred use machines, operated by computers programs rather than a hand labor. In this way, people who used to work in the factories with their hands (carpenters, welders) lost their jobs. If people do not have a job and are not able to financially support their families, their life will become incredibly complicated. Although the total computerization has created new professions such as software engineers and programmers, a lion share of hand labor workers have had troubles to found a place to work. To that end, the evolution of the computer technology resulted in worldwide unemployment.
Secondly, the technological progress has been threatening people`s health. Nowadays, computers are ubiquitous. Millions of people use them every day at work and the biggest part of these people all day long are sitting in their offices and staring at the computers screens. When people did not move enough during the day, they could significantly increase their weight. Obesity, in turn, can lead to the life-threatening diseases such as diabetes. Complications of diabetes are terrible- some people lose their extremities, others struggle with kidneys insufficiency. Though there is plenty of modern medications, which help to control the level of the blood sugar, most of them are very expensive and can not be afforded by an every diabetic patient. Therefore, the development of computers is not beneficial for people`s well-being.
To conclude, I strongly believe that progress always has an egregious site. This is because it can make people sick and unemployed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Chengke | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Chengke | 60 | view |
- What are the good qualities or features of a good newspaper current affairs television program or news website Use specific details and examples to explain your answer 61
- What do you want most in a friend – someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, o someone who is reliable? Which one on these characteristic is more important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice. 66
- Although science and technology are still improving people`s life, there will be not any more effects. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40672782875 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1993965053 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8652248332 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.35 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0801727134163 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272886449488 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037159467132 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635987830655 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317364963393 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.