Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Progress is an inevitable part of life. Every man and community wants to undergo some advancement as time goes by because it is seen as a positive attribute. However, I disagree with the statement that progress is always good for the following reasons.
To begin with, progress can end up leading to the creation of bigger problems. Sometimes, when progress is made in a particular field of human endeavor, it ends up creating even more challenging problems than the problem the progress as solved. For instance, the discovery of antibiotics in the nineteenth century is regarded as one of the biggest progress in the field of medicine. This discovery ended up reducing the number of deaths related to bacteria infections. Nonetheless, as time went by, the over-usage of antibiotics has lead to the evolution of many strains of antibiotics resistant bacteria. Not only have these bacteria become resistant to the effects of drugs, they have also become more virulent. In this case, the progress made by the discovery of antibiotics has lead to the development of more deadly bacteria that are can not be controlled with these antibiotics, thereby leading to a bigger problem.
In addition, some progresses have lead to the loss of lives in a large scale- something that can not be regarded as good. For instance, progress in the field on nuclear physics has lead to the development of nuclear weapons. The impact of these weapons of mass distruction has been seen in the Hiroshima bombing. Although, nuclear physics ihas lead to the building of nuclear plants that are used to power cities, the dangers that the accumulation of nuclear war heads by the powerhouses portends can not be overlooked. So, I believe advancement is not necessarily good because it might end up hurting more people.
In conclusion, I believe progress is not always good because it may end up creating more demanding problems in the further, and it may also end up leading to large scale destruction.
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 66
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 60
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97885196375 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87214428038 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471299093656 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9533986094 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114447807299 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446607263194 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049940278817 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867392801994 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339922204081 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.