Do you agree or disagree with the statement:
University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study.
Nowadays, due to fierce competition in society, university attach greater importance to adopting measures to provide students with high-quality of education. Some people claim that students are unnecessary to take classes that they are not part of the field of study. However, my view is that it is preferable for students to take classes about other fields. Such as basic science classes, it is necessary for students to add these courses to their schedules.
To begin with, we must be prioritized is that basic science classes exert a positive influence on students’ study. For one thing, it is taking basic science classes that can obtain more academic knowledge. To be more specific, students can have access to scientific theories and experimental methods, learning a lot of background knowledge about famous scientists, so as to broaden the horizon and acquire more knowledge. For another, it is taking basic science classes that can motivate students’ interests in study. To explain further, students can learn plenty of interesting scientific phenomenon and explore the scientific principle behind them, so as to stimulate students’ interests in exploring unknown world.
In addition, what is equally worthy is discussing is that basic science courses are conducive to cultivating students’ ability. Initially, never should we ignored that it can increase students’ interpersonal skills in their daily life. In particular, professors often arrange group projects to students, only through group cooperation can students finish their group projects with high quality on time. During this process, cultivating students’ ability of communicating with others and express themselves. Moreover, taking basic science classes can also enhance students’ ability of time management. In detail, the more courses they take, the more time management tasks they should do. In this case, students need to better arrange their own time so that they will learn more efficiently, and it can lay a solid foundation for their future career.
Finally, it is true that taking too many classes will increase students’ burden, however, if we look at the issue form a different prospective, we will find that it is beneficial for students in the long run. From what has been discussed above, we can draw the conclusion that it is more advisable for students to take science classes even though they are not major in scientific field.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decision quickly when a leader takes too much time to make decisions he will be seen as ineffective to the people he lead 7
- It is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one’s own family 76
- It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own or read or watch the news presented by those whose views are different from your own. 3
- Some people think being away from friends can contribute to a good relationship, since they will cherish our relationship. Others think we should stay with friends, which is beneficial to our relationship, and being away from friends will destroy the bond 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ound knowledge about famous scientists, so as to broaden the horizon and acquire more kn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e the scientific principle behind them, so as to stimulate students' interests in e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, as to, in addition, in particular, such as, for one thing, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49606299213 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02739948861 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517060367454 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2666153056 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333470804488 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130221502273 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803141478594 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22144830296 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430091572591 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.