do you agree or disagree? teachers should not make their political or social views known in the classrooms?
Since the beginning of the last century, education has become very significant to our community. Teachers are the most influential factor in the learning process, given that students are affected by their behaviors and ideas. Some people believe that teachers should reveal their political views in the classrooms; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, teachers should not make any social or political views known to students, given that they could mislead students, waste their time. Below I will strive my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, teachers may hold the wrong or bad political view. For example, in Egypt during the presidential election 2013, some of the teachers had a personal agenda which harmed the Egyptian society. They wanted the Muslim Brotherhood candidate to win, so they tried to convince the students to vote for this candidate. Provided that teachers hold an unfair political view, they may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as role models; so they could follow their behavior. Consequently, teachers should not state their political and social point of view in classrooms.
Next, coupled with misleading, wasting time is another reason why teachers should not make their political views known. Talking about the political subjects may not benefit the students academically. A recent survey conducted by Oxford University found that debate on the political stuff inside the classrooms could waste students' time and minimize the potential learning outcomes. Furthermore, there are lots of important subjects that students should learn about to keep themselves updated. The considerable progress and improvement in several filed such as science and literature make any time-wasting can delay or jeopardize students' success. Therefore, teachers should focus on teaching academic subjects.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. There is another subtle point that should be born in mind. Teachers post their political points of view, and students may support or oppose each attitude according to their received information or conducted research. To put it in other words, students could differ in their political attitude, which could trigger a dispute between them. Provided that teachers cannot control the conversation between the students, it can adversely affect their relationships. As a result, losing friends can be a negative impact of sharing political views by teachers.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, the teachers should not talk about their political and social perspectives in the classrooms. It is suggested that schools inform their teachers about the negative impacts of sharing political views in the classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 83 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? people, who have few friends stable for a long time are happier than people who can make new friends easily? 80
- tpo 25 the vessels could be used electric batteries 78
- in the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future? agree or disagree? 81
- tpo 35 international funds for the world's forests 76
- do you agree or disagree? young people today do no give enough time to help in communities? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Since the beginning of the last century, education has become very significant to...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e my supporting points in more detail. The first and foremost point, teachers m...
^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... during the presidential election 2013, some of the teachers had a personal agenda which ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hey may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as role...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd social point of view in classrooms. Next, coupled with misleading, wasting t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... focus on teaching academic subjects. Although the previous reasons are the fi...
^^
Line 4, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of sharing political views by teachers. Taking everything into consideration, wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sharing political views in the classes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, such as, talking about, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50446428571 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74503479751 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524553571429 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0403525246 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.64 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380038348723 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118856627823 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102001521038 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244080740927 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374047682746 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.