Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams

Essay topics:

Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.

Governments are responsible for improving the societies’ progress through effective investment policies. Both art and sport have been playing important roles in people’s daily life. It is difficult to judge whether art or sport is more important than the other. But considering the popularity’s better acceptance to general sports, it’s easier to positively affect people’s daily life through sponsoring sport projects than art projects. So, from my point of view, I think government should spend more money on sport projects than art projects for the following reasons.

First of all, sponsorship of providing athletics a superior training environment will increase their competitiveness and have great impact on popularizing sport. Commonly, many young people see high level athletics as their idol. These young people are mitivated by their idol to engag in playing sport, for either daily exciersing or becoming a professsional athletics. With either purpose, playing sport is of great importance to people’s health and stress releasing since nowadays, most people are having busy working life. Yao Ming is a clear example of how his competitiveness and achievement has been influencing Chinese people’s passion on playing basketball and Chinese basketball players’ hard training to chase an NBA dream. In his early career, he was followed by the coaches from China’s national team and received sponsorship from the government to play in worldwide training camps and games. Later he was picked by played for Houston Rockets in the NBA for 7 seasons which make NBA become very popular in China. Because of him, more and more people fall in love with basketball and the NBA. His experience and performance encourage many basketball lovers to work hard since their childhood to become professional basketball players.

Secondly, sponsorship of athletics to have the opportunity of playing sports in worldwide games like Olympic games or world cup will be exciting and inspiring. As to the athletics, they gain the chance to compete with high level players and present themselves in front of audiences from all around the world. As to audiences, we have the chance to watch different game style from players of diversified countries. In the 2010 Asian Games, Iraq badminton player Yara attended the game as the only one player in the team, even without coaches. At that time Iraq was in wartime and badminton was not a popular sport in Iraq, the country still provided him the overseas training and sponsorship of attending the Asian Games. Though he lost in his first game, he said the game was encouraging and he will definitely train himself harder to get the chance of attending the future Olympic Games. We, as audiences, had witnessed his courage and insistence.

Finally, sponsorship of providing coach and trainer jobs to retired athletics will playan important role on cultivating athletics of next generation. Retired athletics’ can deliver their competitiveness and experience to the young generation athletics. Their career experience will help their students to decide whether they want to become professional player or just want to have the chance to learn a sport for exercising.

To sum up, the above three reasons are why I think the government should pay more money on supporting sport projects. As a sport lover, I truly hope that the development of sports in my country could be better. Clearly, government sponsorship to sport projects is one of the important ways to develop sports.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-21 Take 70 view
2023-05-20 slliland 90 view
2023-05-06 waliwaliwa 85 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 76 view
2023-02-12 redark777 75 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, i think, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2976.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30481283422 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89574483076 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2005850856 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158976322358 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458305787659 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631406520863 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953052813094 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685075605678 0.0645574589148 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.