group project yes or no
The ability to be a good team player and cooperate efficiently with other people can be regarded a decisive farctor in determining an indiviual's chances of success in today's world. While many people might claim that enforcing group projects in universities and high school contributes to the development of this beneficial trait, opponents might argue that it cannot be fair to grade students based on the performance of their group, especially in the competitive academic setting. I agree with the former, and I believe it is crucial to train students the ability to manage and perform well in a group. I will demonstrate further as follows.
Firstly, I believe universities and high schools are the main source of education for people, in every aspect of their lives. Opportunities to develop various skills and enhance one's academic and personal competitive traits are granted to people with little consequence in this environments. While the educational system aims to train people, and it is tolerant of possible shortcomings, occupational environments are by contrast rather brutal and performing poorly in such circumstances can have serious percaussions. Hence, students need to try hard to learn the ability of collaboration with other people, hear opposite views, deal with conflict, and provide support for every team member, even at the expense of lower grades.
Secondly, although attributing the same grade to every member of the group might seem unfair in a superficial glance, it can actually be regarded as an efficient grading system. We cannot speculate that every project in the educational system has to be delivered by groups of students nowadays. I believe a limited number of courses have group projects, and it is safe to assume that in such courses a special fraction of the grade has been assigned to perfrmance of a student in a group rather than their specific information on the course subject. Thus, even if some members of the group did most of the work, but could not motivate of even ask the others strictly to contribute equally, everyone in that group deserves a lower grade overall. Additionally, in my experience, it is often obvious which team member did more and which of them did less. Moreover, to be compeletely meticulous, a teacher can assign a competent group leader to deliver a report on the performance of each member of the group.
Conclusively, I think academic settings provide a great opportunity for students to enhance their ability of being a proficient and cooperative team member, which advances their future career options. Also, grading students based on their group can indeed be considered fair, and it might assisst them in further developing the aforementioned skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | danielkim736 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 85 | view |
| 2022-04-20 | wxr031 | 76 | view |
| 2022-04-20 | wxr031 | 76 | view |
| 2022-04-20 | wxr031 | 73 | view |
- TPO 54 independent agree or not governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic games 90
- TPO 16 independent the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
- history courses should be required in universities or not 73
- TPO 47 independent agree or nor it is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 90
- coal ash contamination 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s to develop various skills and enhance ones academic and personal competitive trait...
^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ed to people with little consequence in this environments. While the educational sys...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20316027088 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94505667944 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52144469526 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2024049773 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0625 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6875 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145843886951 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543213391152 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611563055891 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876676359405 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736715773578 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.