High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study.
Nowadays, education plays a prominent role in our lives. Therefore, there is a hot debate about whether it is better to students can choose your courses selectively. However, I personally subscribe to the view that it is more advantageous to the existence of specific courses for all student can be a beneficial method in the education system mainly because students in the infancy of their education don’t know authenticly their interest and this plan is not gainful for the government. In-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented below.
First and possibly the most important reason why I believe students in the high school's time can not make a decision effectively. In fact, the student should pass the all syllabuses that in the longtime analyzed by specialists. Because student gradually understand your interest and this choice would be perilous for them in the future and absolutely they can not find the best opportunity and it decreased their confidence and their talent may utilized in the opposite way. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I studied in high school, our school wanted to fulfill a similar plan independently to the students could choose your courses discriminatingly. But this plan failed because some of the students choose your syllabuses without any previous knowledge or select your courses haphazardly.
For this reason. I strongly believe that the courses in high school should determine by experts.
There is a further more subtle reason we must consider, which is the fact that the investment of government on this schedule has not any economic’s advantage. because the number of the students who choose different course is variable and absolutely the first choice of the students will course which has more entertainment for them such as sport or art. Usually, these courses have a high cost for schools and subsequently for the government.
Accordingly, I think that the selective course plan is not beneficial for society.
In a word, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account we may draw the conclusion that schools should have a specific course for students. This is primarily due to the students in the high school choose courses under the influence of other and condition and truly this selection will not useful for students and this plan has not any economic benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | neelu sharma | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-14 | navid.pa92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Rengin | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | ygmr | 71 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | ygmr | 71 | view |
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 66
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 60
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 71
- Some people prefer to live in a small town, others prefer to live in a big city. 73
- Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...inatingly. But this plan failed because some of the students choose your syllabuses without...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... has not any economic's advantage. because the number of the students who choose d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, i think, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17571059432 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94412440592 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485788113695 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6904723955 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.277777778 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361660875851 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122147333983 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104944456772 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20122190526 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859909651759 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.