humanoid robots
Technology development brings us changes in human lifestyles. One of the biggest of these changes that we faced in recent years is the development of Robots, especially humanoid robots. Most of us can remember the days when we use to see humanoid robots in science fiction movies, it seems so far, and unbelievable to us, yet we are facing these robots in our lives. They have been integrated into our lives slowly and peaked with the introduction of AI robots which can act like humans and also can feel like mankind. Furthermore, it has caused many arguments between its supporters and opponents. However, opponents believe that governments are not really aware of robots' impact on our world, nor are supporters.
Firstly, some of the opponents see these robots as a threat to their life. They think developing this kind of robot brings competition between humans and robots in various aspects of life such as finding jobs. They believe that these robots are preferred to be used instead of humans; nevertheless, this occurrence brings with it massive social problems. On the contrary, scientists and supporters of these developments assert humankind’s brains are evolving and even in recent years, the IQ and EQ of children are increased impressively. Moreover, these children need new types of jobs instead of traditional hand work. They also mention that the world must synchronize with human development.
Secondly, the opponents are concerned about the future of the relationship between human and robots, they claim that if robots developed in this way and the government do not set rules for monitoring robot developments, very soon robots can dominate humans. On the other hand, the supporters decline this claim and mention that Humans are the ones who created robots and will dominate them in the future, and there is no possibility of the opposite happening.
In contrast, both supporters' and opponents' viewpoints are acceptable. The world and everything in it especially the human brain and the level of thinking evolved through the years and no one can deny it.in this situation, setting rules for monitoring this development may decrease the concerns. In general, we all need to be more patient to go through these changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 87 | view |
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils 73
- eco certified for wood companies 83
- humanoid robots 87
- Replacement for the automobile s main source of power 88
- decreasing number of birds in the Uniteddecreasing number of birds in the United States States decreasing number of birds in the United States 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ost of us can remember the days when we use to see humanoid robots in science ficti...
^^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r world, nor are supporters. Firstly, some of the opponents see these robots as a threat ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in general, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1393442623 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81193207377 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543715846995 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3095218086 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.647058824 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8235294118 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27565229805 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792898098872 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882260075071 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156631483431 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09870073047 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ost of us can remember the days when we use to see humanoid robots in science ficti...
^^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r world, nor are supporters. Firstly, some of the opponents see these robots as a threat ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in general, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1393442623 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81193207377 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543715846995 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3095218086 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.647058824 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8235294118 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27565229805 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792898098872 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882260075071 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156631483431 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09870073047 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.