Chevalier de Seingalt memoir
The author of passage and the lecturer both talk about the accurisity of Chevalier de Seingalt memories, which written in the end of his life and become one of the historical resources about European society. The Author of passage presents a detail about this letter to mention that there aren’t so accurate. However, in contrary, the lecturer believes that this memory is reliable historian sources and contradicts various viewpoints mention in the passage base on three reasons.
To begin with, the author says that a claim of being wealthy to spent on parties and being in mobiles societies, is in contrast with his money borrowings from Swiss merchant which, discovered recently. Yet the lecturer doubt that Chevalier was a merchant and he spent money in some political events which they came back to him through time so it is not a reason to challenge the reliability of his memories.
In additionally, the author mentions the details of Chevalier s meeting in with Voltaire who is the one of the famous writers. He thinks that these memories written so many years after the meeting acquire and remembering the details of conversation is inconceivable. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that on the same night, Chevalier had written the details of the meeting on the piece of paper.
In the end, the author assets the way which Chevalier scape the jill while he was in Italy is seems exaggerated thus, he had a powerful and well-connected political friend which could help him released from prison. The lecturer mention that he kept in political prison which include more powerful persons that they could released with bribe but they couldn’t yet there is a new evidenced find from the documents of that prison about the maintaining the roof of the room which Chevalier was kept there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | joyce05 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | theprasad | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'release'
Suggestion: release
...e more powerful persons that they could released with bribe but they couldn’t yet there ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96369636964 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6599390678 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498349834983 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4527406338 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.4 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119080408129 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497475010446 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057774128163 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690206847534 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298139308888 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.