If you need to take a course, which professor's course would you like to take?
• a professor who was voted the most popular
• a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research
Without a shadow of a doubt, higher education plays a pivotal role in the success of the country's industry. With this in mind, it is an axiomatic fact that in this university-industry chain, professors are the ones who expedite their way to a proper carrier. I, personally, prefer to work with a professor who devotes his or her time to research rather than attend a class for a popular teacher solely. There are several reasons which bear in mind, two of which will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, a teacher due to their direct interaction with students can affect their life and carrier substantially. Devoting an immense amount of time to research, a professor is capable to pave the way for an avid student to build a future as a researcher. Moreover, the unprecedented burgeoning of technology and the hunger for new advances to facilitate daily life culminated in the rising demand for research. Consequently, a professor with a strong background in the research can inspire people to pursue a cutting-edge field of science and afford them an opportunity for a world-changing carrier. On the other hand, a professor who is renowned among students rarely does play a significant role in the progress of the country. Additionally, this popularity could be the result of an erroneous choice for some reason, a nice behavior toward students, a good grading system, to name but a two.
Another prominent motive to choose a professor for a course is the level of academic knowledge. The prerequisite for the research is an advanced degree of knowledge in the respective field. As a result, a talented professor in the research area can broaden students’ horizons and instruct them on practical science. Take my personal experience as a compelling illustration. When I was pursuing my bachelor's degree in the field of chemical engineering, I took a course with a renowned professor who was awarded several times for research. It was a life-altering choice for me because of the practical lessons which I learned in that class. To put it in other words, had not I attended that class, I would not have been succeeded in my carrier as a researcher. Conversely, a class with the most popular professor of the faculty did not broaden my knowledge owing to the fact that the popularity was the result of a fun atmosphere in his class.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the point that I, personally opt for a professor with a background in the research due to the motivation and high level of practical knowledge. It would be unfair not to mention that the increasing need for a better life demands resourceful researchers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-16 | hazrat | 83 | view |
2021-08-16 | meliiw_amd | 86 | view |
2020-08-29 | zg1122 | 85 | view |
2020-08-07 | Mostafalp | 73 | view |
2020-05-28 | Ashkan5515 | 52 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should read only those books that are about real events real people and established facts Use specific reasons and details to support your idea 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- If you need to take a course which professor s course would you like to take a professor who was voted the most popular a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, moreover, so, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92273730684 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09971507675 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494481236203 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.400953377 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350640619109 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101058176813 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630440747061 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207954164596 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672060984846 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.