Making mistakes happens in every corner of our daily life, and skills about how to respond to mistakes are also essential ingredients for us. A controversial question, which method is the best way to respond to mistakes that occur in the class or a meeting has drawn people's attention. When it comes to my perspective, compared to saying nothing or waiting until the meeting or class is over then to correct, I firmly believe that interrupting and correcting the mistake right away is the most suitable one. In the following essay, I will elaborate on what my opinion is based on.
First, a small mistake can further lead to a more serious problem if it not be corrected. Especially in a meeting or a class, cause the content is closely related, a single mistake can cause the logic to derail from what it should be. In addition, once the mistake becomes bigger and bigger, it will take much more time for everyone to correct it. For instance, last semester, the math professor left every student a question to solve after class, which was obviously incorrect and nobody mentioned in the class. During that weekend, almost all students were exhausted in coping with this 'the most difficult problem', until the professor sent the email to inform us about the flaw of the question. Had it been someone who figured out the problem of this question, we would not waste much time on this useless homework.
Second, sometimes the interruption can help everyone to be concentrated. In recent years, many educational researches show that occasional interruption in class contributes to the development of teaching quality. This rule is also fit for the work environment. Due to people in the class or meeting tending to follow what the teacher or leader's saying, their ability to judge the correctness of the content that is conveyed is transitorily reduced. However, a surprising interruption can rouse this ability and help them review whether the content is logically correct. This kind of opinion is widely accepted in universities and famous companies by setting regular discussion during classes or meetings.
A voice arises that interrupts others' speech seems impolite, while this saying should be scrutinized meticulously. In comparison to leading the content that goes wrong, correcting mistakes is the most respectful way for both classes and meetings. Generally speaking, the goal of all participants in a meeting or class is the same, which is to gain the correct information to guide their next steps. Helping the content to be correct, not only the leader or teacher won't blame, but also other participants will appreciate this kind of behavior, for it is a wise choice for everyone's benefit.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, interrupting and correct the mistake immediately is the best choice during this occasions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Agree or disagree to solve the problem of present and future it is necessary to understand the past 80
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 80
- Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ead to a more serious problem if it not be corrected. Especially in a meeting or a...
^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e immediately is the best choice during this occasions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07203389831 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80031534216 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6494930594 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296720762077 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834711924964 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788693302949 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171377455094 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835748324616 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ead to a more serious problem if it not be corrected. Especially in a meeting or a...
^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e immediately is the best choice during this occasions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07203389831 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80031534216 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6494930594 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296720762077 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834711924964 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788693302949 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171377455094 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835748324616 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.