It is crystal clear that everyone wants to have a good and memorable vacation in their free time. In this regard, planning to take a vacation is not a rudimentary decision for individuals. Therefore, a lot of them faces a dilemma for giving more information between two options as to survey online about the location or ask others who had visited. I, personally, prefer to search and read about the candidate places online rather than asking others due to several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
First of all, individuals can easily search on the internet and relevant websites to find proper information about an area. They not only can search for the costs and amazing places but also can find the best routes and hotels which have the best accessibility to the places. In other words, people can easily make a trade-off among their objectives to enhance their convenience at their leisure time on vacations. Consequently, people do not have to ask others in these situations and can increase their knowledge online.
Moreover, people have different ideas and viewpoints, in which, their opinions might be different from my perspective. It is possible that their interests vary from mine, and therefore, they might put extra weight on a subject that is negligible for me. An example can drive this notion home. I was in a doubt to go to Tabriz or Kish in my leisure time, which I had never visited these two places before. Therefore, I asked one of my friends and she tempted me to visit Tabriz instead of Kish, for its weather and mountains. However, when I searched on the internet, I realized that Kish has warmer weather with amazing sea sites, which are more important for me. If I did not search online, I would not understand it.
All in all, there are many noticeable reasons which can be persuasive enough to search and read online about a place for a holiday. I totally agree with the first viewpoint in the title and support my idea in the previous paragraphs.
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81213872832 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64518453728 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4279165599 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167295179124 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529873716211 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562006528269 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110137765087 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476797900464 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.