Internet importance
Regarding whether it is more important for the government to spend more money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation, answers can vary drastically from individual to individual. Some people view the Internet as a necessary thing in life, while others utilize public transportation every day. In my opinion, the importance of internet access outweighs that of public transportation for the following reasons.
To begin with, as technology advanced, people can harness the Internet to do almost everything, such as communication, information searching and even ordering food. It’s believed that people increasingly rely on the internet as time went by and it’s hard to imagine a life without the internet. Therefore, I strongly agree the government should spend money on improving internet access, which not only stabilizes people’s basic needs but brings more convenience as well.
Second, as above mentioned, people can communicate with each other through the internet. In addition, people sometimes need to contact somebody in an emergency. Without good quality internet, it might be difficult for us to contact each other immediately. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Once, during a trip to a famous mountain with my family, I was lost. I rapidly used my smartphone to call my parents. Nevertheless, due to the poor signal of the internet, I couldn’t dial the phone. Fortunately, I ended up finding my mom on my own. As a result, this event had lead me to conclude that it’s important to always have access to the internet and the government should improve the quality of the internet with money to prevent a such dangerous situation.
Last but not least, some people have exploited the internet to do something professional. For example, pilots need the internet to help them fly their planes. Stock traders get the latest statistics through the internet. Reporters need the internet to capture the latest news around the world. It’s the internet that helps those people to have a good performance on their jobs. As for me, I used to work at an electronic commerce company that is highly related to the internet. Many times, I used the internet to finish my work. If I hadn’t had good internet access, I might have encountered some troubles. Accordingly, I strongly agree with the idea that government should spend money to improve the quality of the internet.
To summarize, from what I’ve mentioned above, the internet brings plentiful benefits. It maintains our basic needs, solves our emergency, and professionally assist our work. Therefore, the government should spend money on improving the internet, guaranteeing that we can have access to the internet readily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-04 | Allenwlh | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | neilyuan | 86 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | Uttama Shekhawat | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | ellen87713 | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... on my own. As a result, this event had lead me to conclude that it’s important to a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[3]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... on my own. As a result, this event had lead me to conclude that it’s important to a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24601366743 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95725853343 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50569476082 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8632428879 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2962962963 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2592592593 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18518518519 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429317440612 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125329377937 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864582353207 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25415218146 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495367189968 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.