The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
It is suggested that the internet provides fantastic opportunities for virtual traveling and learning the ways people live abroad. Indisputably, billions of websites store an enormous amount of information about peoples all over the world that is available for free and quickly from every device. But it is also impossible to disagree with the fact that the internet fails to convey the emotions of native people, tastes of their national dishes cooked uniquely.
To start with, needless to acknowledge the fact that there is a great multitude of data on the internet that is available to everybody without the need to spend money for visas, tickets, and hotel accommodation as well as time on the plane flying to a foreign country. Anybody can open the browser, type a request to the server, and get a ton of comprehensive information about whatever they want. It will never take more than 0 cents and 1 minute, but you will get everything you need. If you type a correct question, the system will show you billions of sources such as Youtube videos, Instagram posts, Facebook blogs, or Wikipedia articles. All of them allow you to learn how people live even in very distant corners of the Earth. But it is plausibly the only field where the internet surely wins real traveling.
Even though you can acquire plenty of knowledge from the web, it cannot provide you with probably the most important type of information that includes feelings and emotions. For example, it is very difficult to comprehend the problems of living in the middle of the Pacific Ocean without exploring what native people feel. You have to talk to natives, live as native, speak as native, think as native to comprehend their way of life, reasons for holding it, and its consequences.
Even more, nobody can understand the culture without trying native dishes, which, unfortunately, cannot be transferred through the web. Even though you can find a recipe, you cannot cook it yourself in the way native people do. For instance, pizza is cooked all over the world, but the native one is still unique, not comparable to any of the pizzas cooked outside Italy. So, disability to convey tastes is also a noticeable disadvantage of virtual traveling over the real one.
To sum up, even though the internet means an opportunity for exploring the world, it is not perfect. While some information is probably transferred more precisely through the web than through real traveling, the other is doomed to be missing.
- The reading passage suggests that R robustus was a scavenger However the professor contends that it a hunter 81
- The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- The maps show the Grange park as it is today and as it was a century earlier 89
- More educators these days are using technology in the classroom In fact many teachers now record their lectures upload them on a website and ask students to watch them before their lesson During class students report on the lectures and discuss them toget 90
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past can help us better understand the present Do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...ry device. But it is also impossible to disagree with the fact that the internet fails to convey the emotio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their national dishes cooked uniquely. To start with, needless to acknowledge t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e internet surely wins real traveling. Even though you can acquire plenty of kn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for holding it, and its consequences. Even more, nobody can understand the cul...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... virtual traveling over the real one. To sum up, even though the internet mean...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94272076372 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66563073808 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536992840095 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0781661061 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.055555556 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183762994193 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544013221972 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497545553485 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092931351478 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306438931182 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.