The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that printed textbooks will never disappear in the school learning process, despite that modern technology is offering the humanity more and more opportunities. Honestly, I do agree with this opinion and here I will state two reasons why I am convinced that it is true.
Indeed, traditional books make the students utilize their imagination and improve their creative thinking which is important for writing essays later in the future. During the process of reading textbooks, people develop their abilities to pay attention on details, learn synonymic words and improve the grammar knowledge. All these listed abilities facilitate our brain development which fosters the academic success and positively affects our use of everyday life skills, makes us more productive and effective in the studies. The Internet is not able to provide such opportunity to student as technology was created to serve as a tool to find the information fast, but not deep.
By the same token, reading a physical book develops the mental skills of students and trains them to make decisions. It enhances their ability to search for the needed information by themselves and learn how to solve problems apart from the outside help. These skills are crucial for the growing generation as it will train them to act on their own and apply the critical thinking abilities. The Internet can hardly ever offer this experience since it fulfills the user’s needs by giving an immediate answer and has little effect on our brain development.
Nonetheless, the fast development of the technologies cannot be overestimated and it is easier for the students to search any information in the Internet than it encyclopedia. More and more applications and programs are appearing nowadays: Wikipedia enables us to search any fact or story that we are craving to find. As for the videos, Youtube is a modern tool to watch a big range of lections of every area or theme. It definitely implements getting the answers on our questions fast, but does not train any of our skills.
To sum up, I would like to say that the Internet will never remove the use of traditional textbook in the educational process. Printed books’ need in the educational system is crucial and the Internet will never offer the mankind the options that the book approach will.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...little effect on our brain development. Nonetheless, the fast development of the...
^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...More and more applications and programs are appearing nowadays: Wikipedia enables us to searc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, honestly, if, nonetheless, so, apart from, as for, it is true, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76510067642 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561038961039 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1066606875 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.6875 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183514767651 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586670465613 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729345481215 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116548927801 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101476970958 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.