It is better for elders to take risks and explore new things than young people.
In this rapidly changing world, there are new things happening around us each day. Many people believe that young people have less to lose and should take their chances when they can, while others think that older people have the time and money to explore without worrying about life. In my opinion, I think young people should explore the world while they can and not wait until they are old.
To begin with, young people are more open to accept new stuffs. They can enjoy following the latest trend, whereas old people always find them troublesome. To be more concise, when the new technology is invented in the world, it will change the life style. Such is surprising thing that old people cannot follow the trend, and have hard time to learn how to use new technology. Take cellphone as a compelling example. Young people can quickly learn the uses of app in mobile phones such as watching Youtube and playing games, but old people find it hard to use the latest functions of mobile phone, even though mobile is convenient to our life. Since young people are willing to learn new stuffs, they are better to explore new things than elders people.
Furthermore, young have more energy, so they are suitable to take risk and explore new things. The more new things are, the more energy they need to put in it. To be more specific, to explore new things is difficult, and is likely to take risk. If scientists aspire to explore new things, they must stay in lab for a long time to do experiment. Young researcher can stay up late or work overtime to study, which is often beyond the physical limits of the old. For instance, Graphene, a new amazing material, was invented by young scientific researcher. When they carried out this experiment, they spoke tremendous time on doing repeating work using tape to tear off graphene from Carbon. This experiment process was laborious and time consuming, so this is why I say young researcher was better to explore new things than the old people.
Admittedly, some people might opposite me regarding this statement. For instance, not all young people are health. However, what I said is a general case because most young people are healthier than old people. Hence, I am of the opinion that we should let young people explore new stuffs. This is because they are more willing to accept new things, such as new technology, and because they are energetic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | meet96300 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | nph | 60 | view |
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 66
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be s 66
- Reading Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the 80
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group Do you think a person s honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7446300716 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32145604833 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496420047733 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7576367558 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4347826087 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466234243486 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149995045985 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109349564952 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294298368025 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457345850405 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.