It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
During this complicated world with lots of issues for managing, beside of having a suitable job, having more free time is a profitable amazing chance to handle it. In my opinion, it is better to have a job with long hours only three days a week instead of shorter hours for five days of a week. I feel this way for two main reasons.
First of all, having more off days during the week could be more benefit for your health. During the work there is lots of pressure that could lead to make unhealthful situations. So every person with more relaxation time during the week could be more fresh for working time. For example, every time my sister was going to her job, she was very tired and so exhausted about working. But when she talked with his boss about revising time work for long hours but more off days, now she is very fresh and have more leisure time for herself. Therefore, she is not only upset about her job but also have more fun with her collogues after work.
Secondly, with having more off days through a week, we can fix another plans of our life that we do not have time for them before that. We can manage our time for extra activity and use of our personal time to improving ourselves. For example, when I was working in a company during the week just for three days I handle some of my issues too like going English class due to be an excellent expert in my profession as well. So I could rise my position to a better grade with that skill which leads to a good salary also.
In conclusion, with long hours and fewer days on working during a week, would be produced extra days with no especially task. then can use it for relaxing or improving based on different situation in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities. 60
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 61
- some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while other thinks realistic goals are more important. which do you prefer and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lots'?
Suggestion: there are lots
...enefit for your health. During the work there is lots of pressure that could lead to make unh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...that skill which leads to a good salary also. In conclusion, with long hours and f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...ced extra days with no especially task. then can use it for relaxing or improving ba...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.334375 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1523039073 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503125 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0647481518 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4666666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39870356369 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154288921841 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118602015428 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2798960456 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087931765702 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.