It’s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school.
Professors set various strategies to provide students with concentration for their study. While some teachers impose methods to explain to students how this subject helps them better outside of the school, others create other ways. It is so controversial for people to decide on a specific statistic. In my view, it is not the best way to improve the interests of students for the study through an explanation about how this lecture connects with better their life. Teachers should teach their students about the importance of communication with others, make a great friendship in school, and join clubs or organizations.
To begin with, it is a better way to educate students on why communication is a momentum in their life. In modern society, people rely on tons of technologies such as smartphones, computers, and laptops, and so on. Therefore, it would be difficult for the young generation to talk with others in real situations. On the other hand, once professors change the mindset of students about making conversations with classmates, they can easily adapt to social life after they graduate from a university or college.
Secondly, establishing the best friendship constructs a better life for students. There is a fair amount of long-lasting friendship in school life and even after people leave from their school. They count on each other to come up with and ask them little tiny concerns. For instance, my friend was not able to get a picture of how they equip furniture in his room and ask me to achieve a piece of advice. From my suggestion, he could find out the best position for a chair. Even though these perplexes are subtle, people can solve them and relieve their anxieties from their best friends.
Finally, students should take part in a club or organization in order to accomplish a better life. Participation in sports clubs or student governments provides students with practical skills to survive in social life in their future. Take an example about a basketball club, coach estimates each player by their skill and energy in a practice. If players are not good at playing basketball and showing motivation in practice, they would be not a starter member in a real game. It is the same as the situation in companies. If employees cannot prove their value in a meeting and toward bosses, they would not earn bountiful money to live a better life. Consequently, students should experience several social circumstances before being a worker at a company.
To sum up, talking about how each lecture is related to a better life for students is not significant. I surely believe that they should construct plenty of conversations with classmates, attain best friends, and participate in clubs for their precious life.
- Nowadays people are busy with many things If you were given a short period of time what would you choose 1 learn to play a new sport you never played 2 learn to cook food in a different way 3 learn to do some hand made work like clothes 76
- Which of the following is the most beneficial for young people during their spare time 1 gaining practical work experience through part time job or volunteering in the community 2 learning to play a sport 3 learning to play a musical instrument 68
- Many young people face the problems of finding a job after graduation Which of the following method would you recommend 1 asking for others advice 2 sending emails to the companies 3 searching information online or other publications 66
- Some people prefer to take small classes in which the professor can remember every student s name Other people think it is better to take big classes Which do you prefer and why 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parent should limit the hours that children spend on digital products besides schoolwork 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, talking about, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2298.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0284463895 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87864707553 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520787746171 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0505904256 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0416666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288201116645 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804395592319 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854630123819 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167838169373 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115415337522 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.