It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?
Of those issues that many societies are involved and interested in, the role of teachers in the educational system is one of the most prominent. In this respect, some people believe that being simultaneously popular and efficacious seems to be at odds with each other. While some others stand at the other extreme, holding the view that the combination of these two redeeming features will lead to prosperous school performance. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I side with those latter people. The following paragraphs lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, the popularity along with the efficiency of teachers will soar the motivation of students, cultivating them to improve their performance in response to their benevolent, favorite teachers. That is to say, feeling privileged to be under the tutelage of erudite, experienced teachers, the pupils' learning capability will be alleviated. To elucidate more on this issue, these teachers will be listened to more scrupulously and efficiently; the presence of which will be conducive to better proficiency of students. Not until the teachers are popular and effective can students progress aptly. It has been acknowledged that many underage students are the victim of their instructors' ignorance, bringing them nothing but a higher level of stress and a sense of disappointment. It stands to the reason that pupils, specifically those under thirteen, need to be paid more attention by their mentors, giving them under their wing. To make the story short, students are captivated by their teachers if they feel assured learning and working under a benevolent, hard-working instructor.
What is more, being under the training of such an instructive, compassionate teacher, students will be more prosperous in the near future. To elaborate on this view, due to this critical juncture of life, students are taught miscellaneous upright conduct since they are more receptive to their teachers as the role model. So beneficial is the role of instructors that their considerations will be paid off someday in the future. It is worth mentioning that young students are on the threshold of adulthood, walking through the door to their future. It is justifiable to say that the prospect generation will jump through the achievement hoops on the assumption that they are inspired by the patronage of their favorite, instructive teachers. When laying the hope of future development over students, teachers cannot shirk from the responsibility of being a decent role in their scholars' lives. Correspondingly, teachers, as a whole, are the cornerstone of burgeoning talents from time immemorial.
To wrap it up, I have to reiterate my standpoint that not only teachers should be efficacious in their performance, but also they should be equipped with higher aspirations, that is being cherished. It is hoped that schools, like a miniature society, employ instructors who are cognizant of students' requirements not only mentally but also emotionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | Hossein2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | AgnesYY | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | AliKopol | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone." 88
- TPO51 3
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. Riding bicycle or walking on foot2. Recycling the waste3. Buy local organic food 71
- TPO1 8
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33544303797 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09310401647 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0175430374 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188251804121 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612456591358 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546567502599 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116699310231 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398286827022 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.