land use for human needs or for endangered animals
The earth is now witnessing a controversial issue in the using and saving of land. There is no denying that land use if essential to the development of human society. If no more land is available for people to explore, the living space will no longer endure the pressure from growth in population. On the other hand, if the land that animals inhabit is invaded by humans, an increasing number will reach the verge of extinction. Consequently, the ecological balance will be severely disrupted. Thus, only through having a good balance between land use and land conservation can such a dilemma be solved.
To begin with, land use ensures further development for human society. It involves the management and modification of wild land into areas for human needs. As many as seven billion people live on this planet today. To satisfy the most fundamental demand of the growing population, land ought to be used properly. For instance, if there is not enough supply of farmland, fewer crops can be harvested for food. This will increase the number of starving people in the world. The same is true with land for residential use. No one wishes to witness the rootless existence of those who are not settled down due to the lack of living space. In addition, the construction of commercial districts and public open spaces as well as the creation of industrial parks are all major projects that make a society advance towards a higher level. Evidently, the use of land is of essential importance to the survival of humankind and the advancement of human society.
Without a doubt, human should also shoulder the responsibility to protect animals from dying out. Endangered species like jaguars, leopards, brown bears, giant pandas and tigers are disappearing at an alarming rate due to the overuse of land and deforestation. Ancient ecosystem is being disturbed during human’s excessive exploitations. Such problems have intensified over recent years with unprecedented population growth and urbanization. Thriving and healthy environment is of vital importance to people’s well-being, but it is met with potential crisis owing to the extinction of rare animals. If more endangered animals are extinct, so will humankind soon or later. As valuable inhabitants on this planet, animals, especially those in danger of extinction, should never be deprived of a space to live and thrive. In a sense, saving land for these animals is equal to saving their lives.
Therefore, the government should seek to order and regulate land use in an efficient and ethical way. It is also imperative to make cautious plans to maintain the balance between using and saving land. Meanwhile, assessing the land potential and searching for alternatives for land use are also favorable options for the government. In doing so, the needs of human can be ensured and natural resources can be safeguarded.
To sum up, the harmony between human and nature is of vital importance in the modern world today. Land management is by no means an easy task. It involves all-round consideration and foresight. Excessive exploitation ought to be strictly prohibited. To use the land cautiously while protecting the endangered animals is a wise choice. Indeed, the far-reaching advancement of a society owes much to a well=balanced social and natural environment
- access to much information creates problems. agree/disagree 73
- children should not be allowed to play computer games 73
- land for human needs or endangered animals 73
- land used for shopping mall or performance art center or hotel 76
- it is better to specialize in only one specific subject than to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. agree/disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.0752688172 421% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2800.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16605166052 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98084186546 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522140221402 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6838414558 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3529411765 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474168171708 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112066875246 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113250453381 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276751809086 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891038826672 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.