leadership comes naturally. one can not learn to be a leader
Based on the psychologist hypothesis, people have two kinds of characteristics, some of them are inherent and people inherit them from their ancestors but people learn other characteristics during their lives. I personally subscribe to the idea that leadership and managing are some kinds of skills that can be taught to everyone in society and everyone can be a prosperous leader.
To begin with, the most important factor for a patron is self-confidence and people usually achieve this level of confidence through practice. Knowing the ability of yourself helps everyone to increase this property. for instance, children during their elementary school learn to do some project in a group and one group always have a leader so teachers teach them required material and characteristic through this practicing.
Second, a manager should have communication skills at the highest level because they should contract with different companies and people so they must be able to convince them toward their job or product with a good relationship. Communication is a social ability and people learn it when they are a child and always improve it since their audience increase over time. For example, a company which imports and exports some products first has rare customers and after that, they improve their work to other countries. In this situation, they should communicate with people from different countries and different cultures to expand their trade. Through this example we understand that a patron should improve his communication skills since this ability can improve over time, it is not just related to the people’s intrinsic.
Additionally, becoming a patron in a big company required some hierarchies and no one can be in this position at the beginning of his work. These hierarchies help people to learn all of the parameters which are necessary for a leader. For example, in a bank, the employees are a cashier at first then improve their position and climb the corporate redder to become a leader. People cannot become a patron in just one day since they do not have enough information and skill for this level of the job.
In conclusion, I totally believe that leadership is not a natural ability because people learn and boost it during their life and they should acquire some essential skills to achieve this goal.
- in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future 73
- the opinion of celebrities are more important to younger people than they are to older people 71
- which one give you better informtion for selecting for taking vacation. asking someone or reading online 76
- people benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 65
- the ability to maintain friendship for a long period of time with small friends is important than making many friends easily 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...lps everyone to increase this property. for instance, children during their element...
^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... These hierarchies help people to learn all of the parameters which are necessary for a le...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14435695538 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8523071839 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469816272966 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5014509556 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164992198855 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655882437266 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735919898503 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112260501611 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05957492933 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.