Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to discussing the importance of past experience, previous events are regarded as useless in the decision-making process in the present. I disagree with this point of view because humanity has a long history, which cannot be ignored because we are part of this way. By keeping continuity of knowledge, we can learn from the experience of our ancestors for the development of the contemporary world.
First of all, learning about the past has a significant meaning, because it gives us the undeniable advantage of using the lessons and failures of foregoing generations. For example, by learning the disasters brought by World War I and World War II, people now are concerned about peace more than ever before. Furthermore, without sharing our experiences, we inevitably encounter the same hardships repeatedly. The government in Russia, for instance, ignores fires in Siberia happening regularly. As a result of underestimating past experience, we are losing a lot of forests every year.
By the same token, errors from the past are discipline through which we advance. Progress is always based on accumulative attempts to overcome numerous obstacles, so it is a never-ending story. The Olympic games are a good example of this continuity whereby many records are there to be challenged, and some become the past, whereas others will challenge the participants in the future.
Furthermore, it is a fact that by engaging in our history, we can easily perceive the rules of modern society, because it is a continuous process. In contrast, indifference to prior events obstructs communication with other individuals and understanding ourselves. We may underestimate the influence of the common heritage of mankind, but the misunderstanding of our own roots inevitably leads to a feeling of isolation from our families and close surrounding groups, which determine the patterns of our behavior.
In sum, I believe that learning about the past has many benefits for us living in the present because we can learn from the lessons and failures of foregoing generations, as well as build upon the success of our predecessors. In other words, the past is as important as the present.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-26 | sisbr7963 | 73 | view |
2020-11-14 | fmichela | 81 | view |
2020-09-16 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 73 | view |
2016-07-29 | kiwiloves | 79 | view |
2016-03-25 | younes.tatari | 79 | view |
- The reading passage suggests that R robustus was a scavenger However the professor contends that it a hunter 81
- Pie charts illustrate how university students spent their money 78
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Now they have an opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 60
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...t comes to discussing the importance of past experience, previous events are regarded as useles...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...gularly. As a result of underestimating past experience, we are losing a lot of forests every y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2209631728 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16481186721 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552407932011 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9472766691 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163188903876 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05343948535 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570880854248 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100326737467 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769528903143 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.