Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
Views differ when it comes to the issue of whether, throughout history, life becomes more straightforward or not. Even though a certain conclusion cannot be drawn on this issue, I am, to a great extent, on the belief that life is not as tough as it was. I feel this for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, one of the compelling reasons that gives justification for my stance is that the pace of technology advancement has been astonishing in recent times. It transparent that no century witnessed more progress in technology than the 21st century did. The 21st century has been characterized by plenty of innovation and by the manufacturing tons of incredible devices. These invention of new devices has helped people deal with rigors and difficulties faced with in their lives a lot easier than before. Moreover, the advent of internet and particularly computers are a few examples of these breakthroughs that pave the way. Little are people found without being familiar with internet or using a smartphone. For instance, I do lots of works through internet in the blink of the eye using my smartphone. I check my bank account without the need of standing in a line for a long time.
Accompanied by the first reason elaborated above, urbanization is another point which requires meticulous attention. That is to say, the growth of immigration of people from villages or outskirts of the metropolises, in the last decades, can be regarded as their penchant for living in a more comfortable conditions. In fact, large cities offer a variety of facilities and provide integral infrastructures for living to their dwellers which may not be available in small cities. Once my mother told me about how much she suffered from living in a small village. Since their access to running water was limited they had to walk a long distance to fill the containers for their use. Hence, when she married with my father they both moved to a bigger city.
All the previously mentioned factors considered, although there are likely to at least some exceptions that do not include the general rule, the conclusion to be drawn is that life is by far more comfortable these days. To recapitulate the reasons, not only the progress of technology but also living in a large cities facilitate the way of people lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | swson0330 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | fafar | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | TEJAS PATIL | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'These inventions'?
Suggestion: This invention; These inventions
...nufacturing tons of incredible devices. These invention of new devices has helped people deal w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h may not be available in small cities. Once my mother told me about how much she su...
^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'city'?
Suggestion: city
...f technology but also living in a large cities facilitate the way of people lifestyle....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, at least, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, that is to say, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89447236181 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89284048079 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570351758794 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3070624057 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.526315789 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123281590394 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032740154697 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430969963405 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780652445633 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302164574381 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.