Live in big city or small city
\
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-11-23 | Yiyi | 90 | view |
2019-04-09 | khosrow nouroozi | 66 | view |
2018-07-22 | zhangjuw16 | 90 | view |
2017-07-22 | Sina Pourang | 70 | view |
2016-07-15 | hhnesaz | 82 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters email or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 71
- Live in big city or small city 70
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which one do you prefer 50
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone Others like to be with friends most of the time Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends Give reasons to support your answer 50
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
from different country, different religious,
from different countries, different religions,
children who bringing up in a big town, almost successful in their lives.
children who are bringing up in a big town, are almost successful in their lives.
children bringing up in a big town are almost successful in their lives.
people who live in a big town can use healthy food due the high-tech facilities
people who live in a big town can use healthy food due to the high-tech facilities
Considering the afore-mentioned arguments and discussion,
Considering the afore-mentioned arguments and discussions,
it is not rational underestimate the advantages of city life
it is not rational to underestimate the advantages of city life
flaws:
1. No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2 //you have grammatical issues.
2. The introduction is too long. Can make it shorter. Simply put your ideas/options. Don't need to compare over there.
3. Better to break the second paragraph down to 2-3 paragraphs. It is too long. and Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
4. No. of Words: 516 350 //make sure you can finish the essay writing in 30 minutes. 350 - 450 words are actually enough.
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 516 350
No. of Characters: 2499 1500
No. of Different Words: 244 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.766 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.843 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.782 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 184 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.435 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.223 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.522 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.128 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ountry is fresh and without pollutions. Also they always eat fresh foods and fruits ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2576.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00194174757 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93511444168 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491262135922 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5891414983 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372103551474 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105483121982 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799982282591 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251717373844 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636676796425 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.