Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
\
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters email or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 71
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone Others like to be with friends most of the time Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends Give reasons to support your answer 50
- Live in big city or small city 70
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which one do you prefer 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
face-to-face communication have a crucial role
face-to-face communication has a crucial role
face-to-face communication plays a crucial role //better
People should find new ways to save their time in which do their job.
People should find new ways to save their time in which they can do their job. //after 'in which', it should follow a complete sentence
It is not efficient spend a lot of money
It is not efficient to spend a lot of money
technology help humankind to communicate
technology helps humankind to communicate
face-to-face communication encourage people
face-to-face communication encourages people
Sentence: In todays world, technology help humankind to communicate easier and more convenient.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to todays and world
People can know better each other by see their facial expressions.
People can know each other better by seeing their facial expressions.
Sentence: They can talk with their besties via their cellphones in their busy time.
Error: besties Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
1. No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2 //Read a good grammar book.
2. Try to develop 5 paragraphs. like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
you will need to change the writing style. The second paragraph is too long and it will lose credits with bad organizations.
3. There are a lot of pattern sentences. Try to remove them. The examiners can figure them out easily. Instead user your own language.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 477 350
No. of Characters: 2416 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.673 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.065 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.043 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 69 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.08 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.733 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.443 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27157894737 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16864835695 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492631578947 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2442671585 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.16 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211688875721 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620667241715 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585040790871 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139963280039 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329835791298 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.