Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls.
Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
For hundreds of years, people have never stopped debating about the best way of communication since it is momentous. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that using letters, email or other means of distance communication are superior to face to face relationship, I would counter this point of view due to some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following essay.
Above all, one specific character of face to face communication is that you can meet people in groups which has a huge impact on the quality of conversations. To be more exact, when people take part in groups, they can be familiar with distinctive perspectives. In other words, people can consider a subject from different points of view in group discussion. Take some of my courses in university, for example. We have to make unique group and find out others opinions about a number of subjects and share our ideas with them, which will lead to better understanding while by using letters and emails you won’t be able to do such a thing.
The other reason which deserves some words is that people will figure out how they should deal effectively with others by face to face communications. To clarify this point, every relationship is kind of practice to improve our skills. Consequently, we will find out how we should talk or behave with others by face to face communications. My younger brother is a compelling example of that. He was extremely angry as a teenager since he was often alone and tried to do things by his smart phone. As he grew up, he communicates with people more and more, afterwards, he modified his personality and became an easy going person who are usually calm and cheerful, able to cope with the life’s difficulties. In addition, he faces with others more effectively and politely than the past. As a result, I think face to face communication can make people calm.
Another subtle point which I should deem lies on the fact that using letters, email, or telephone calls have some problems which can result in disturbances. For one thing, it is possible that you face with lots of cut off during your telephone calls which is really irritating. For another, it is likely that letters and emails stay unanswered for a long time because the person whom you wrote does not pay attention to them.
To sum up, based on aforementioned arguments explored in this essay, I strongly believe that face to face communication is far preferable to the others.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- TPO 56 80
- TPO 55 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones online games and social networking Web sites 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
... of distance communication are superior to face to face relationship, I would counter this poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, really, so, while, for example, i mean, i think, in addition, kind of, as a result, for one thing, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78873239437 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81572354091 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1324275284 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34078917287 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969886890175 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074017583452 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182197353625 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021569381281 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.