Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies at school.
What are the causes?
What are the possible solutions to this problem?
It may not that phenomenal but quite noticeable that some kids feel it is hard to stay focused in their classes. Schools, teachers, and parents are making attempts to figure out the reasons behind that with the aim to perfect the educational system where each child could absorb knowledge, learn skills so as to be prepared for their future life. This essay is going to undertake exploration for the cause of this issue and try to make some suggestions for it.
The foremost reason for this issue is tightly related to the profession of teachers. Their methodology for teaching kids is not desirable. Undeniably, a certain proportion of teachers are not that professional. They cannot organize the classes reasonably. How to intrigue their students’ interests is not their strong suit. Relating their teaching contents to some practical issues is beyond their ability. However, children are naturally naive, curious, and mind-exploring. Those tedious classes surely cannot grab their attention. Children not dozing off in such dreary classes is a miracle. Secondly, the arrangement of classes should be blamed for such a phenomenon. As far as I am concerned, the subjects are so finite in supply for students, some of whom could not find the classes they are really into. Unfortunately, to meet their requirement for graduation, they have to choose some subjects out of the boring ones to learn. In order to pass exams and get credit, students might try to pay attention to their teachers, but this kind of attention is involuntary. It takes so much effort that it is just a matter of time for students’ minds to wander off.
Based on the causes for this problem, there are some suggestions to solve it accordingly. To start with, training teachers is the top priority. Not only should they be excellent in their academic field, but also master teaching methodology. How to apply what they have learned to each class is quite of great importance. With years of experience, they are qualified to present an absorbing class for kids. What‘s more, schools should open up more choices of subjects for students, which will lower the possibility that students feel hard to devise their new term class schedules.
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language others however think that a student should not be required to learn a foreign language if he or she does not have talent for it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 60
- Even if science and technology would continue to advance and improve the quality of people lives the most significant improvements have already taken place Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 90
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 61
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ld could absorb knowledge, learn skills so as to be prepared for their future life. This...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1142, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds wandering'.
Suggestion: minds wandering
... is just a matter of time for students’ minds to wander off. Based on the causes for this pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, as to, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03814713896 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76402818487 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555858310627 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.871814034 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3913043478 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170822719472 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474693851887 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437424575163 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115143422813 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313973826272 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.