Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Essay topics:

Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Many imperative natural resources, such as forests are not accurately being conserved and we are witnessing procedures like deforestation that lead to tremendous effects that affect all of our lives. Since human life is affiliated with forests in many ways, forest conservation seems to be an imperative procedure that should be prioritized.

First, the forests are living filters. They produce a mass amount of Oxygen which is a by-product of photosynthesis. More than 20 percent of the world's breathable Oxygen is produced in the Amazon rainforest alone, which means one in five breaths. Besides, they absorb Carbon dioxide which is the main pollutant of air pollution, leading to a reduction in air pollution.

Also, the forests have been the main source of raw materials for lumber, plywood, paper, and packaging. Although this may be one major drawback of cutting trees but cutting them down in a conservative process, by growing 5 trees when cutting down one, can be a reasonable way.

Last but not least, forests are inhabitants of animals. Forests, cover 30% of the earth's land surface; this is more than the total area of Russia, the United States of America and Canada Combined. The tropical forests are the home of a lot of animals that cannot survive in any other site or climatic conditions and deforestation lead to many animals' extinction - whether living on land or in water.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-05 mobinzaarreh 70 view
2019-10-09 Sinor 60 view
2019-07-12 haditajik 80 view
2019-07-12 haditajik 76 view
2019-04-11 ranarano 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sinor :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many imperative natural resources, such ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...procedure that should be prioritized. First, the forests are living filters. T...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding to a reduction in air pollution. Also, the forests have been the main sou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g down one, can be a reasonable way. Last but not least, forests are inhabita...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...nditions and deforestation lead to many animals extinction - whether living on land or ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, as for, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 230.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82916248063 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64347826087 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6774804288 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123720056473 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038943012852 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373142238129 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669620845932 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309927654326 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.