Children encounter different origins that can affect their behavior unproductively. Adults should make efforts to protect their children from situations where it can teach them misbehavior. I believe the initial step is to oversee them while they are playing with their friends. Close supervision helps parents recognize the issue better and find out the dominating source. And then, they can take action based on the underlying cause to change their behavior.
Observing children while they are playing is an effective way to understand them better. Children act differently when they are playing with their friends. They act honest and more natural while playing whereas they show some shift in their attitudes when they face an adult. Observing them in these periods can help adults figure out whether adults themselves caused this misbehaving. However, if the tracking shows that the child behavior is consistent, then parents can look for other problems or diseases like hyper-activity that needs a professionals assistant. Monitoring can also reveal if games or friends caused this situation. As a result, adults can limit their child friends or ask them not to play a certain kind of games. Parents can also inform other parents about their child situation and jointly manage this situation.
After understanding misbehavior origin, parents should move forward to save their children from further harm and misconducting. Several options are available based on the result of monitoring. Some parents may find out that child's friends or games caused the problem, as expressed before, in this state, they can limit their friends or prohibit problematic games, respectively. To avoid harming children's feelings, adults should provide situations in which he or she can find a better friend or offer him/her a suitable game. However, if they find out that the child behavior is consistent they should talk with a Trappist first. In most cases, adults behavior themselves caused the problem, so they are the ones who should have therapy sessions. Otherwise, a Trappist should test children closely.
Various sources might cause children's misbehavior. Examining children while they are playing is a key move to find the underlying cause. Knowing the cause, it is easier for adults to find a proper solution. Despite the provided solutions, an intelligent action is consulting a professional Trappist or psychologist.
- Nowadays, parents don't have the time to play with their children anymore. What activity should they ask the children to do during the period: have fun playing games/sports, or spend time with schoolwork? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities. 76
- Tpo 44Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 60
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- Monitoring or observing children while they are playing with their friends is an effective way to solve children's misbehavior problem. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, whereas, while, kind of, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42063492063 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76379575031 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521164021164 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.848903437 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.375 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375103027739 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119620854892 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105644136401 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241525802612 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508149144956 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.