negative impact
Our current way of life has many versions and variables to it. It basically is like a coin has two sides to it; the way of life we currently have might destroy the planet or worsen the living conditions for future generations, however we also have some habits or ideologies which would shape this world to be a better place to live in. If I have to choose, I would lean towards the idea that our current way of life may indeed have a negative impact on the future generations.
Firstly, the reckless use of natural resources is what I think would be the primary reason for a negative impact on the future generations. The oil reserves or resources like water are so carelessly used or rather wasted that we might not leave any of it for our future generations. This frivolous attitude would not lead to anywhere good and would render the future generations unsustainable. Careless use of resources spike up the prices of oil in turn affecting the overall economy of the world and by way of example, India is the second largest oil importer; if oil resources are reduced to a great extent, the value Indian rupee would further decrease in turn affecting the economy.
In addition to reckless use of non renewable resources, environment conservation is definitely not given sufficient importance. If enough efforts are not taken, and trees are cut or destroyed due to forest fires, it would make many species homeless. Many animals would die due to lack of food and home. The ecosystem would be completely out of balance. I recall that recently, there was a fire in Amazon forest which went on destroying and burning trees for 3 weeks. This incident gave rise to many unimaginable effects in regards to climate change, global warming and oxygen levels of the planet! If our environment is destroyed at this pace and we do not take enough efforts to conserve it, our future generations won’t be able to live a healthy life.
Last but not the least, our current way of life can be broadly categorised as a corporate rat race. In this rat race, there is no kindness, compassion and love for people around us. I remember, the other day, one of my colleagues took advantage of a situation which was unethical and resulted in exploitation of his juniors. This incident however led him to a promotion and my colleague does not regret taking advantage of his juniors one bit. If this rat race does not stop, if we do not take amount to live or life and love others to the fullest, if exploitation and taking advantage of others becomes mundane and normal, it would be the doom of humankind according to me. Love and compassion is what would help the current way of our life as well as the future generations.
In conclusion, I lean towards and agree with the statement that our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. These negative impacts according to me could be caused due to our careless attitude and utter disrespect for others but I also believe that it is in our hands to change this situation and make this planet a better place to live for our future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-29 | nph | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-29 | nph | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | chaithu067 | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | ishitakush.08 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... gave rise to many unimaginable effects in regards to climate change, global warming and oxyg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66120218579 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67028107644 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457194899818 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1745505249 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112932488905 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434154247209 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914468976885 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853306958682 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886921983903 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.