In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use of cars is a very subjective issue; for some it can be a status quo whereas for some it might just be a way of commuting. I personally agree with the statement that there would be fewer cars in use after twenty years than there are today. I am of the opinion that public transportation would be preferred by majority of people in future to avoid excess traffic and needless consumption of fuel.
Firstly, fuel consumption by personal cars would be a problem. We have limited fuel reserves and we can’t afford to use them recklessly. If four people use four different cars for commuting to the same workplace, it is anything but using our natural resources wisely. By way of example, many companies and corporations even today, provide a bus for their employees to commute. This approach is benefitting in two ways; increased convenience of employees(as they do not have to drive) and fuel savings along with decreased pollution.
In addition to high fuel consumption, pollution would be increased to great amount harming the environment in countless ways. Taking into consideration China or India, the pollution levels in some areas have increased to an extent where people are wearing masks even while walking down the road. A major part of the population uses personal cars and vehicles leading to increased pollution. These living conditions are so harmful and people have started moving from such places only to enjoy a healthy environment and some clean air.
Finally, the world population is increasing day by day. The population boom will not allow for everyone to drive cars; the roads won’t be able to contain such a huge amount of cars. The traffic which would be created when everyone is driving their cars would be horrific. Beijing is a classic example of high traffic and in turn, people end up wasting a lot of time during commute. A simple bus can replace approximately thirty cars on the road, thus reducing traffic to a great extent.
In conclusion, these are reasons why we shouldn’t be using our personal cars when there is an option of public transport. I believe people have already or will soon realise the importance of these issues and hence, I agree with the statement and am of the strong opinion that there will be fewer cars in use after twenty years than there are today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - Turtle Excluder Device (TED) 80
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by installing in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 75
- negative impact 73
- driverless cars 83
- negative I'm;act 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, whereas, while, as for, in addition, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86146095718 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70445694983 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523929471033 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.54902983 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.578947368 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380629885378 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115893875218 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152676813996 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237042666778 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160210540738 0.0645574589148 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.