negative I'm;act
Our current way of life has many versions and variables to it. It basically is like a coin has two sides to it; the way of life we currently have might destroy the planet or worsen the living conditions for future generations, however we also have some habits or ideologies which would shape this world to be a better place to live in. If I have to choose, I would lean towards the idea that our current way of life may indeed have a negative impact on the future generations.
Firstly, the reckless use of natural resources is what I think would be the primary reason for a negative impact on the future generations. The oil reserves or resources like water are so carelessly used or rather wasted that we might not leave any of it for our future generations. This frivolous attitude would not lead to anywhere good and would render the future generations unsustainable. Careless use of resources spike up the prices of oil in turn affecting the overall economy of the world and by way of example, India is the second largest oil importer; if oil resources are reduced to a great extent, the value Indian rupee would further decrease in turn affecting the economy.
In addition to reckless use of non renewable resources, environment conservation is definitely not given sufficient importance. If enough efforts are not taken, and trees are cut or destroyed due to forest fires, it would make many species homeless. Many animals would die due to lack of food and home. The ecosystem would be completely out of balance. I recall that recently, there was a fire in Amazon forest which went on destroying and burning trees for 3 weeks. This incident gave rise to many unimaginable effects in regards to climate change, global warming and oxygen levels of the planet! If our environment is destroyed at this pace and we do not take enough efforts to conserve it, our future generations won’t be able to live a healthy life.
Last but not the least, our current way of life can be broadly categorised as a corporate rat race. In this rat race, there is no kindness, compassion and love for people around us. I remember, the other day, one of my colleagues took advantage of a situation which was unethical and resulted in exploitation of his juniors. This incident however led him to a promotion and my colleague does not regret taking advantage of his juniors one bit. If this rat race does not stop, if we do not take amount to live or life and love others to the fullest, if exploitation and taking advantage of others becomes mundane and normal, it would be the doom of humankind according to me. Love and compassion is what would help the current way of our life as well as the future generations.
In conclusion, I lean towards and agree with the statement that our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. These negative impacts according to me could be caused due to our careless attitude and utter disrespect for others but I also believe that it is in our hands to change this situation and make this planet a better place to live for our future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | harsh12345555 | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-16 | Bngtn | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... gave rise to many unimaginable effects in regards to climate change, global warming and oxyg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 7.30242825607 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 22.412803532 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 1373.03311258 186% => OK
No of words: 549.0 270.72406181 203% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66120218579 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.04702891845 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67028107644 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 145.348785872 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457194899818 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 419.366225166 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1745505249 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0357788008724 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0136093739872 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286448021695 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0268779774532 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278034728857 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 63.6247240618 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.