Nowadays many high school and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
In today's education, there are plenty of teamworks that cooperate with each other. Some people might think it is a great idea to give the whole group the same grade in order to evaluate students. However, I tend to believe that giving students different grade according to their behaviour is the proper way to evaluate students.
To begin with, evaluating students objectively and differently can be beneficial to students to present their greatest ability. In the group work, some individuals might work hard but someone may do nothing. Recieving the same grade is so unfair to the hardworking members that they might don't pay attention to the project and lose the enthusiasm of studying. In contrast, grading separately, students may devote their whole offort into the project and complete the task in high quality and efficiency. Some distracted students that might even been not noticed in the group can expose many problems and then improve themselves. This can only make the evaluation manifest their best purpose.
What's more, separate scoring can be conducive to positive competitions among students. After recieving different scores, they may share with the classmates. In order to receive better evaluations and compete their classmates, they will definitely improve themselves to perform well. However, in a teamwork that everyone receives the same grades, there is no competiton about learning, so the whole project becomes meaningless.
Admittedly, giving same grade to evert member in the group can let them present their comprehensive ability instead of academic ones. However, it's unfair for some of the students who put in more effort and accomplish more tasks. It turns out the same results as others, these students are likely to lose their motivation for learning thus losing the meaning of evaluation.
In conclusion, different scoring not only can let students behave better but also has positive competitiions among students. By doing this, students must have much more desires to learn than before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-30 | ayumiyazaki | 76 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | aryanaf.ir | 73 | view |
- smart cars 88
- the Chaco Canyon 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children ages five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Pterosaurs 63
- One Child Policy 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the hardworking members that they might dont pay attention to the project and lose t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...luation manifest their best purpose. Whats more, separate scoring can be conducive...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... academic ones. However, its unfair for some of the students who put in more effort and acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34579439252 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70228706342 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5895279973 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294297383899 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867749874222 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744595616869 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156343212755 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829469305865 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the hardworking members that they might dont pay attention to the project and lose t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...luation manifest their best purpose. Whats more, separate scoring can be conducive...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... academic ones. However, its unfair for some of the students who put in more effort and acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34579439252 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70228706342 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5895279973 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294297383899 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867749874222 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744595616869 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156343212755 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829469305865 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.