A glance at peoples attitude towards helping brings light to a question that has been debating for a long time; whether current society his more helpful than our ancestors. Although, it is popular to look down upon the present society, It is my firm belief that we are more generous than our ancestors. In what follows I will elaborate and explain on what my perspective is based on.
First of all, current generation has a higher education level than previous generations. With the development of education techniques and systems, nowadays school give more priority to moral education. Therefore, students know why we need to help others. They understand that helping is a chain reaction, which begins from a small spark and spread across whole society. For instance, when I was in primary school , my class teacher encourage students to help others and she had a star rating system to choose the most helpful student. Therefore, everyone try to help others. Most of the times these helps are small things like giving a pencil or pen. But what we develop is train our minds to give things for the greater benefits. Today, I proud to say that most of my friends from primary school are famous philanthropists in the city. This all started with giving a pencil to the friend next to you.
Secondly, unlike past today people has higher quality of life. Where the do not need to worry about wild animal attacks. They have enough food to supply for their families. In contrast, past the battle for survival forced people to first think about you and your families. If you share food with you neighbor, your children might have to fill their stomach with just water. In other words, most of our ancestors did not had the capacity to help others. However, with the progression of human civilization and technology, current society enjoys the fruits of prosperity. This has increased peoples capacity to help. The battle is no longer to survive you and your family. The battle go forward with whole society.
However, some believe that contemporary society is more selfish and they use news about thefts, murders from papers and other media as proofs. If one look at more carefully they will find that these news sources and social media contains more about good people who give their helping hands, sometimes thousands of unknowns. Additionally, development of social media has encourage people to help other more. For instance celebrities and influencers usually post videos about them helping poor people which encourages their fans to do the same.
Nowadays, people are educated and they understand the importance of helping others. Additionally, with increase of the quality of life current society has the capacity to help other than our ancestors. Moreover, we can see that social media also encourage people to help others. For these reasons, I strongly believe that, we are fortunate to live in a helpful society, which has lengthen their helping hands progressively.
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 73
- Statement of Porpose 3
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- Providing internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r instance, when I was in primary school , my class teacher encourage students to ...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oday people has higher quality of life. Where the do not need to worry about wild ani...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eople has higher quality of life. Where the do not need to worry about wild animal att...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...er words, most of our ancestors did not had the capacity to help others. However, w...
^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...onally, development of social media has encourage people to help other more. For instance...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 381, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lengthened'.
Suggestion: lengthened
...to live in a helpful society, which has lengthen their helping hands progressively.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01008064516 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55384072203 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510080645161 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6959922046 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1612903226 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54838709677 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33618543954 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842102157558 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070358447052 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18879896607 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052691313818 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.