In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
With the powerful internet, today's people have access to numerous news from every corner of the world. And there are many platforms, like twitter and BBC, providiing us with those information, telling us what is happening around the world. Under this circumstance, some people suggest we should obtain information from different news resources to be well-informed. Personally, I vehemently agree with this view as we are unlikely to know what we want to know and reach the fact at most unless we retrieve information from different sources. The detailed reasons will be explored in following paragraphs.
Firstly, it is acknowledged that one single media can't cover all news from the world. Each media has its own disposition. For example, Scientific American is intended to supply audiences with newest scientific discoveries in a friendly way so you can understand the state-of-art technologies, like IoT and AI, by watching their videos in Youtube. However, they won't cover sports news which belongs to the field of ESPN. As consequence, you need to choose the news source according to the category that the news you want know belongs to. Moreover, different countries' news institutions usually report different news. For instance, if you want to know what is happening in China, the newspaper producted by Chinese companies, like Xinhua news, should be your first choice since it is obvious that local reporters know about local events more comprehensively that foreign reporters.
Secondly, it is known that an event can be interpreted in different ways since reporters have their own objective judgement even though they are often required to be neutral. So if you want to know the truth, getting information of the same event from different medias is a reasonable way. The news of covid-19 is a great example. At the beginning, many news platforms suppose people not have to wear masks since it doesn't work as expected. However, other platforms, including official medical institution of China and the WHO, strongly advise people aggregating in the public place to wear masks to prevent being infected because they have conducted related experiments to prove masks' functions. Many people surrounded by patients have benefited from wearing masks. After collecting information from different sources, you can make your own judgement according to your experience and environment where you live in rather than being flooded by opinions from a single source.
It is admitted that digesting information from different sources certainly consume more time. However, holding a sensible view and act correctly can usually prevent you from wasting more time in the wrong direction.
To conclude that, I firmly cling to the view that we should get information from diverse sources to be well-informed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | prakriti malla | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | yuexplore | 90 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning would be better for students 81
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 73
- Beliefs about elephants 76
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...ike twitter and BBC, providiing us with those information, telling us what is happening around th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t is acknowledged that one single media cant cover all news from the world. Each med...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...dia cant cover all news from the world. Each media has its own disposition. For exam...
^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ver all news from the world. Each media has its own disposition. For example, Scien...
^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the newest'.
Suggestion: with the newest
...merican is intended to supply audiences with newest scientific discoveries in a friendly wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly way" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nces with newest scientific discoveries in a friendly way so you can understand the state-of-art ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...nt know belongs to. Moreover, different countries news institutions usually report differ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... people not have to wear masks since it doesnt work as expected. However, other platfo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31685393258 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85649358684 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543820224719 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4647198147 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346722505127 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106766469597 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899563135567 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216603051123 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06180596608 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.