Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. You agree or disagree with the statement. Support your answer with examples.
Originality is such a common word in present time that each and every company tries to get it's patent in the name of idea, methodology or approach and files it's complaint against the person or company, who seemed to have copied it's idea or even a punch line of any advertisement. Various discussions and debate have been conducted on television or newspaper article casting issues every now and then. I firmly believe that originality is nothing but a collection of previously used ideas, presented in a unique enormous approach. Some light has been casted out on the support of idea below.
Many theories used today have used old theories to support their answer, almost all the inventions uses idea used previously in some other inventions. For instance, Einstein's law has been used for the concept of big bang theory, MAC OS uses linux, missile project follows Newton's law of gravity. Similarly many other concepts uses old concepts to support the main idea of the newly created concept. Had everyone signed patent for those old laws of physics, we would not have been successful in many projects.
Furthermore, the concept of sharing gives rise to the invention tree, it gives immense help to the other projects which are either being used to humanity or science development society. For example, the concept of RSS feed was used initially started by Schwartz, a young passionate developer, his idea which is an open source is currently beneficial for many other social community projects.
Hence, the originality of idea can never be claimed and it should never be, as it it for the betterment of humankind and science. The more we set resources free and patent free, the more powerful will be the mother of invention and invention free from any kind of fear of using it as a stair of success. Not only this, it will save ample amount of time in researching and developing those things but sharing will save them the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | SERDARKOCAK | 80 | view |
| 2017-01-01 | koku | 76 | view |
- TOEFL essay: Is the ability to read and write more important today than in the past? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- A friend had invited you for a meal at his/her place. Write a letter to your friend. In you letter-Thank him/her for inviting you-Describe how you felt about his/her family members-Make suggestions about his/her visit to your place 73
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 90
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
- D/A To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ion or newspaper article casting issues every now and then. I firmly believe that originality is n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...project follows Newtons law of gravity. Similarly many other concepts uses old concepts t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...r be claimed and it should never be, as it it for the betterment of humankind and sci...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, similarly, so, then, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8696969697 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58892357024 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4323176008 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819184773412 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334445867862 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324559896255 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047714942344 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152564508253 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.