People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things; other people learn by reading about things; others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your choice.
Everyone has their own capability of seeking knowledge which is crucial for their learning process. In my opinion, the best method of learning things for me by practical implementation and by listening to people talk about things. I feel this way for the following reasons which I will explore in this essay.
To begin with, practical learning helps to memorize things more profoundly which means it stays forever in memory. Seeking knowledge about new things is significant for developement of personality. When a person read something it can be forget easily. However, practical implementation of knowledge gives lifetime expereince to a person that stays with them throughout their life. To exemplify, when I studied in high school my regualr courses were not very good. This is because I did not like to read whole book throughly as it was difficult for me to understand clearly. However, practical labs of chemistry and biology always fascinated me because we perform practical about topics we studied in class. These practicals lab helps me understand more throrougly about the life and chemicals. For this reason, I choose to became a biologist. This example elucidate that learning by doing things aid understanding things more deeply.
In addition, listening to an expert for an information helps me save my time that I spend on reading about things. Accordding to a research people when listened to an experience person seek information better as compare to a person reading about that information. This is because a mind abosrbs things better by listening. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Few days before my chemistry exams I got sick, which is why I was unable to studied properly. My friend helped me with my studies. She came to my house and simply taught me all the topics of chemistry. I gained so much knowledge in few hours and when I study the subject by myself I was able to memorize the things more easily. I was able to clear my exam with good grades. This would not have been possible if I did not listen to her and just read.
In conclusion, the best possible ways of learning for me are by listening to an expert and by pratically doing things. This is because, it helps me getting deep knowledge about it and, because I can quickly learn the knowledge and save time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | ursula | 66 | view |
| 2021-02-22 | Umairpharmd1 | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 90 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and the telephone have changed the way that nations interact with each other in a global society Choose another technological innovation that you think is important Give specific reasons and e 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement With the help of technology students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 60
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students Which point of view do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ficant for developement of personality. When a person read something it can be forge...
^^^^
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'practicals'' or 'practical's'?
Suggestion: practicals'; practical's
...about topics we studied in class. These practicals lab helps me understand more throrougly...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'elucidates'.
Suggestion: elucidates
...ose to became a biologist. This example elucidate that learning by doing things aid under...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...perience person seek information better as compare to a person reading about that ...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to get' or 'get'.
Suggestion: to get; get
...ng things. This is because, it helps me getting deep knowledge about it and, because I ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86616161616 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77418845236 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487373737374 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2395646577 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.08 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.84 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.24 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274942285408 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817450663187 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990413803196 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208174311707 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844396583142 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.