People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your choice.
It is an undeniable fact that learning is essential for a human being. Some people prefer to learn in different ways. As it to me, I learn better by doing things. I think it is the best and the most efficient way to perceive information and study it. I will give some plausible examples to bolster my opinion.
Firstly, when we interact with the real world and learn by doing things, we understand how certain mechanisms and theories work. While other people are trying to overcome their society class, a purposeful man can take up doing work in young age and at the time he will be an adult he can have a successful business. Although theoretical knowledge is sometimes sufficient for people, usually, they are not able to use it.
Secondly, practice always differs from theory. We encounter this phenomenon throughout our lives. For example, a person who is trying to learn to drive a car can read a myriad of books and manuals, which explain how to push pedals and the like, but he/she will not be able to drive it, to feel it. Only practical knowledge is useful, because we do not interact with the ideas in dreams, but we interact with the material things in the real world.
Thirdly, practice gives us a remarkable opportunity to evolve. When we see how some particular mechanisms work, we can draw conclusions and guess in advance how other things function. It is possible to follow the path from primitive knowledge to complexed matters. Furthermore, learning by doing things improves our creativity. We accommodate and improve the skill of creating and devising, which is very important in increasingly changing world.
What conclusion can be drawn from this? In my opinion, learning by doing things is the most efficient way of learning, because we do not imagine how something occurs, but we participate in these processes. Moreover, learning by doing things is beneficial also because it does not require any degree, diploma or specialized knowledge. Finally, there is a good quote: "you can teach the square of sum formula thousands of times, but a student will get it only when he tries it".
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | Raed Mudawar | 73 | view |
- What do you consider to be the most important room in a house? Why is this room more important to you than any other room? 60
- Childhood is the happiest time of a person's life. 80
- Childhood is the happiest time of a person's life. 60
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for sometimes in the future? 60
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...in different ways. As it to me, I learn better by doing things. I think it is the best...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87845303867 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72498935505 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566298342541 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7897056166 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0952380952 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258084063119 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085321148915 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109169767123 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163537807537 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112063834641 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.