People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Do you agree or disagree?
Even though the learning process can occur in trhough many sources as reading books, internet, sharing ideas with others. I am inclined to believe that it is people above us, who can teach us most in life. In the following paragraphs I will give to examples for the reasons that makes me hold this opinion.
First and furthermost, I strongly believe that experience is very significant for teaching any subject. For instance, I was studying for an English proficiency test with a friend, until I started questioning our method and even if we were getting any progress. So I decided to take private lessons with a specialized professor who actually have expertise about all the tasks of the test and can truly evaluate my work through official tools I didn’t have access previously. I’ve been seeing much more progress in two weeks than I saw in a month of studies with my friend.
Secondly, in a work field, co-workers are most likely to hold the same position and consequently the same point of view in daily basis issues. On the other hand, supervisors might have passed for multiple positions and gained expertise from different areas and older experiences. Couple of years ago I got into an argument with my engineering crew about some ordinary problem on the construction site. I didn’t want to bother my supervisor with something that we could solve by ourselves. Later that day, I shared what I was doing with my boss, not to ask for his opinion, just to let him know about my activities. Even though I didn’t ask, he shared his position and the problem was solved within five minutes. If I have shared the issue earlier with him, I could have spent my time in other important activities.
In conclusion, despite the fact that one can always learn something from simply sharing ideas with any person and any situation. I strongly believe that professors and professionals in higher positions have more knowledge and hold different methods that make the learning process more efficient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- A person should never make a difficult decision by yourself. 3
- Life today is more esier and more confortable than it was when your grandparents were children. Do you agree or desagree? 78
- Integrated Writing Task: Chaco Canyon: How the buildings were used? Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed on the reading passage. 90
- Soon technology will provide smart cars: that virtually drive themselves. Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage. 70
- Communal Online Eancyclopedia x Traditional Printed Encyclopedia 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91202346041 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72186895675 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9078262343 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.046515773869 0.236089414692 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0163145638852 0.076458572812 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191285379164 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334462269584 0.150856017488 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228887854675 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.