Twenty-first century is an era of highly skilled and technically advanced people. The number of skills in the market are emerging with the evolution of new business trends and demands of technology, but to what extent these skills will mushroom is something no one can predict. People who develop different skills are more successful or people who develop one skill is highly debated. To my perception, the people developing skill related to one particular domain are more successful. Below mentioned are some noticable points in the support of idea.
First key aspect is, focusing on one skill is more easier than focusing on many skills. Time consumption is needed in order to learn one skill, followed by time to convert that it into an expertise, whereas it becomes tough for people to focus on many skills all at once. On the completion of one skill, other skill can be learned which might be time consuming. For instance, due to busy schedule people do not have much time to learn too many things at the same time so, they focus on improvising one skill more in order to excel or to take their career to a next level using that one skill. However, people focusing on different skills at the same time lack perfection in one thing resulting in chosing the wrong skill path sometimes.
Second factor contributing is that jobs are domain specific or skill specific and not multi-skill specified. For example, a coder cannot be a business manger at the same time, because management people are often the ones' having management degree but, coder can pursue business management course in order to become businness manager which might result in leaving his previous skill set of core coding.
To sum up the entire perception, I would say that different skills might enable us to do multi-tasking but will hinder us from the expertise that we can have therefore, person with one skill is more successful. In order to spearhead our career we always need to focus on making our skills more stronge.
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. You agree or disagree with the statement. Support your answer with examples. 76
- The increase in mobile phone use in recent years has transformed the way we live, communicate and do business. Mobile phones can also be the cause of social or medical problems. What forms do these problems take? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 78
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 90
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street.What the problems would beWhat are the main causesYour suggestions 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...key aspect is, focusing on one skill is more easier than focusing on many skills. Time cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: MANGER_MANAGER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'business manager'?
Suggestion: business manager
...ified. For example, a coder cannot be a business manger at the same time, because management pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57034009412 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.245677564 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474241558447 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196391578397 0.076458572812 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194523583527 0.0737576698707 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287089494524 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168756657797 0.0645574589148 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.