Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
1）Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2）Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3）Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When we stay at school or participate a conference, learning how to deal the relationship with teachers and leaders is significant. The process of correcting a mistake during a class or a meeting indeed testing our ability and steel our bond with teachers or leaders. Some people prefer interrupting and correcting the mistake right away while others prefer saying nothing. However, I think the best way is waiting until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talking to the teacher or meeting leader.
First of all, the waiting and talking approach avoids interfering the consistency of the class or the meeting. As a matter of fact, in our “teacher-center” class, the teachers always rule the classroom the roost by using a prescribed approach which is deliberately designed to teach a generate curriculum to everyone at the same time. Therefore, the teachers and the leaders control the whole pace of the class and meeting and manage to fulfill all the information within the assigned time. However, if the teachers or the leaders are interrupted, he or she will have to spend time to explain and correct the mistakes, which will elongate the time of class and destroy the whole schedule. What’s more, in order to continue the class from the interference, the teachers or the leaders have to recall the previous object and then go on to the next step, which also cost a massive time. For instance, one of my friends Jones interrupted the teachers and pointed out the mistake immediately. Notwithstanding the problem was solved, we did not have the time to keep on the class and we could not finish the exam we have to revise that day. However, if Jones could introduce the question after the class, our class efficiency and consistency could be promising.
Secondly, the waiting and talking approach can show respect towards the teachers and leaders. As we all know, the teachers an leaders are the symbol of academic authority and the power of the company. When being challenged in the public, like being pointed out their mistakes, they may feel disgraced and consider their authority being lowered. Undoubtedly, pointing out the mistake in the public will also add the pressure on the teachers or the leaders, which regard as the rudeness. Therefore waiting until everyone are gone can not only solve the problem but show our respect.
In conclusion, considerate these aspects, I would like to wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then point out the mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | daoistwang | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | kkang | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Bonjourkmm | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to the teacher or meeting leader. First of all, the waiting and talking ap...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...which is deliberately designed to teach a generate curriculum to everyone at the same time...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1261, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... class efficiency and consistency could be promising. Secondly, the waiting and talking...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and consistency could be promising. Secondly, the waiting and talking approa...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d leaders. As we all know, the teachers an leaders are the symbol of academic auth...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: an leader; leaders
...d leaders. As we all know, the teachers an leaders are the symbol of academic authority an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... leaders, which regard as the rudeness. Therefore waiting until everyone are gone can not...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the problem but show our respect. In conclusion, considerate these aspects...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 13.8261648746 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95327102804 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84789603657 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471962616822 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6202598425 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126896271859 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455121050531 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301769250926 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761285419434 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460635629794 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.