The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world is changing at a fast pace and no two days are the same and the rules which form society are modifying rapidly. when it comes to societies' expectation from younger people some controversy arises. some people hold the opinion that nowadays, the rules that society expect from youngsters are extremely strict. I disagree with this idea; in the ensuing lines, I will explain two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First, thanks to the hardworking activists, young people have more freedom of choice in political and religious issues. these items form the main part of the youngsters' characteristic. Decades ago, rarely do young people were daring enough to express their opinion about these matters and they had to obey older people's attitudes. young activists worked hard to explain and convince the rest of society to respect and understand youngsters' freedom of choice. As a result, having a different perspective is not offensive towards elderlies and youngsters can readily express even harsh words towards political and religious matters. Take my friend Jessy as an example, she has an extremely religious Muslim mother and when she was younger she has no choice but to wear hijab. when she went to high school, she found out she hated hijab and forcing her wearing hijab was violating her right. So she started fighting for her freedom in the family and society and now she has a different appearance rather than her family, but they respect her because Jessy thought them to respect her beliefs.
Second, I believe rules are less strict because the punishment for inappropriate acts is declining. In the past, young people were under a lot of pressure because of severe punishment from families, schools, and societies. these days, the severity is declining and they can easily do actions which were restricted at that time. less punishment causes less strictness in rules because people are sure that their wrong act will not have horrible consequences. youngsters in the past were under such a strict punishment that they were afraid of thinking about delinquency let alone doing it. For instance, in the past, schools expected children to do their assignment completely otherwise, students were in risk of expelling; on the other hand, today, there is less punishment towards youngsters and they can easily violate rules with no fear.
In conclusion, based on aforementioned explanations and examples, I believe that societies' expected rules are less strict rather than the past because of activists hardworking for youngsters' freedom of choice especially in political and religious matters and less punishment for young people' violations in recent time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | sandeshbhandari2 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | marii.r67 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | shero | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | shero | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Seema Modak | 76 | view |
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 88
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors. 76
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ich form society are modifying rapidly. when it comes to societies expectation from ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich form society are modifying rapidly. when it comes to societies expectation from ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...younger people some controversy arises. some people hold the opinion that nowadays, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...oice in political and religious issues. these items form the main part of the youngst...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Young
...ey had to obey older peoples attitudes. young activists worked hard to explain and co...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 774, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...er she has no choice but to wear hijab. when she went to high school, she found out ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... from families, schools, and societies. these days, the severity is declining and the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Less
...ons which were restricted at that time. less punishment causes less strictness in ru...
^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Youngsters
...ct will not have horrible consequences. youngsters in the past were under such a strict pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21296296296 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70905340222 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497685185185 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4238975125 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.526315789 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180591741191 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639489474527 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569863579713 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128123593878 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469280119491 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.